Echoes of the Past – Tales of Old Yavapai in Arizona – Vol 1, by the Yavapai Cowbelles of Arizona

Version 1.0.0

Why this book: My wife and I inherited a second home in Prescott in Yavapai County, Az and we visit there pretty regularly. I recently attended a Cowboy Poetry, Music, and Story Telling “convention” in Prescott and was excited to learn how Prescott is a center for the preservation of the history and culture of cowboys in the region. At that event, I bought all three volumes of stories of the history of Prescott. .

Summary in 3 sentences: This book is Vol 1 in a series of three books of short stories and articles by and about people, places, events and the culture of the people who settled Prescott Az, the county seat of Yavapai County. Vol 1 is mostly about 70-120 years ago and many of these are simple, but authentic renditions from the people who actually lived in and around Prescott during that period, their stories “echoes” of life as it once was. The people who wrote these stories were descendants of and/or knew and interviewed those still alive who’d arrived in Prescott in the late 1800s when it was an isolated outpost on the frontier.

My Impressions: I loved reading these stories – so unpretentious, and so evocative of life on the frontier in the West, without all the drama, hyperbole, and romance that one sees on TV and the movie Westerns. First published in 1955, it includes short stories and articles written by and about the people who settled Yavapai county 100-150 years ago, how they lived, met their challenges, struggled, supported and took care of each other, and together, survivied. Authentic and real, the character of the people who built and settled Prescott and Yavapai county, and by extension, much of the Western frontier, shines through loud and clear.

A few of the many noteworthy stories are about: cowboys (what their life was like and what they really did), the origins of agricutlure in the region, dealing with Apaches when settling the southern part of Yavapai County, a biography of a woman (entitled “Our Mama”) who had come from ranching in Texas to ranching in Prescott, the struggles she and her husband experienced ranching while raising a large family, This piece was written while 78, this remarkable woman was still alive at 78 yrs old. There’s a long-ish story about how Prescott originated the rodeo in the West with the first rodeo on the 4th of July 1888 and which continues to this day on the 4th of July. And much more…fun book to read and full of insights about life on the frontier a century and more ago.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Superconvergence, by Jamie Metzl

Why this book: A topic that facinates me. I was able to talk my science fiction book club into selecting it for our Aug 2024 read. I listened to rather than read the book.  

Summary in 4 Sentences: The author in this book explores the convergence of three relatively recent developments in technology that together will significantly change our world – for the good and potentially for  worse.  He looks at genetic engineering and bio tech and (in addition to CRISPR on humans) he looks at how it has already and will increasingly change the food we eat, how it is produced and how it can increase our capacity to feed the world’s growing population.  He examines how AI is accelerating medical research into understanding proteins and cell behaviour and creating digital twins of humans,  to better understand how medicines will affect each individual, and  explore how our current generalized sick-care can evolve to focus on prevention and medical procedures tailored to each individual’s biology, referred to as “precision health care.”  And he balances all these exciting technological advances, bypointing out the many significant potential dangers and even “existential  hreats” and challenges humanity will have in preventing those very bad outcomes from occurring.  

My Impressions:  Wow!  Pretty much a mind blower!   I thought I was relatively savvy in some of the more modern tech advances associated with AI and virtual reality and augmented reality, but this deep dive into the role that high tech is playing in biology opened my eyes to so much more – of exciting opportunities, and scary (even likely) potential bad outcomes. 

He says that with these new technologies, humans now have the ability to hack the source code of life, to redirect evolution, and engineer new forms of intelligence.  We will be able to find new cures for currently incurable diseases – even prevent them – with new bio-tech and genetic treatments.  We can create new forms of agricultural products that are resistant to disease and insects (indeed we already have) that can feed many more people using less land and water, create animal protein from stem cells from living creatures rather than raising and slaughtering billions of them annually.  He says the opportunities and possibilities are breathtaking, and so are the risks. 

Each of the technologies he describes includes warnings about what could happen if safeguards are not in place and where bad actors, or well-intentioned but unguided good actors could create challenges, sometimes irreversible to our and other species.  He points out that cutting edge research is being done all over the world, often unregulated and/or with inadequate safeguards in place.  He is convinced that the COVID Pandemic was a result of such research done without adequate safety protocols and warns of more and worse possibilities in the future. 

He points to the promise and threats of bio-tech, genetic manipulation and creating heritable changes in human genes (called gene drive technology) and the urgency that international protocols be agreed upon and somehow enforced  to manage how this research is conducted.  But given the nature of international competition and tensions, he is not optimistic in the short term for any enforceable regulation that will mitigate the threats he foresees.  

The book also talks about how our current agricultural and meat processing has expanded to become a threat to our planet. He offers some eye-opening statistics on different ways that food production is contributing to green house gases and deforestation.  He notes that using bio-tech and gene manipulation could significantly decrease the amount of arable land necessary to grow the food we need, or for grazing and sustaining livestock, and thereby improve our environment and planet.  The numerous downsides to pursuing current processes to feed the worlds growing population is a constant theme in the book.

Two of the other mind-boggling and fascinating revelations in this book are

  1. Bio tech is rapidly developoing potential solutions to the increasing challenges of data storage,  by storing retrievable data in DNA, which as he points out, is biology’s very effective mechanism for storing information. 
  2. Scientists in biochemistry, microbiology, materials science and structural engineering are collaborating to genetically engineer bacteria to create useful minerals and polymers, and form them into living building blocks, stronger and more resilient and environmentally friendly than current building materials. 

He constantly reminds us that technological advancements and scientific knowledge are increasing at an exponential rate and that rate of change continues to accelerate, and will disrupt much of what we now take for granted – hopefully for the better, but potentially for the worse.  He emphasizes that technology itself does not have values – and whether these changes are for the better or worse will depend on the values we humans impose upon the research and experimentation in these fields – values of the technologists themselves as well as of governing bodies. But he points out that each individual will have a voice, and positive values must be embraced by a broad spectrum of humanity outside the tech communities. And he acknowledges that this is a real challenge. 

He concludes the book with a series of recommendations for international protocols for managing the rapid acceleration of AI, bio-tech and gene engineering research, to maximize benefits and at least manage what he sees as the significant risks posed by unbridled and unregulated research and experimentation. 

Metzl himself does a three and a half minute overview of his book on youtube at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_7g3ORGQB8

If this topic interests you, but you may not have time to read this book, Metzl’s  60 minute keynote presentation with Q&A at a Bio Conference in 2024 in San Diego is a good overview of the highlights of his book. It can be heard at  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-SSh796VFA

As I post this, I have downloaded to listen to Metl’s book Hacking Darwin which takes a deep dive into the issues of gene editing as a tool for human advancement, longevity, as well as the potential unintended consequences that put us at risk. This is one of many topics in Superconvegence, but Hacking Darwin goes into it in depth. The beginning has so far been intirguing and a great follow up to Superconvergence

=========

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

North Woods, by Daniel Mason

Why this book: I saw a review of it on-line and it looked interesting.  I talked my literature book club into selecting it for our September 2024 session. 

Summary in 3 Sentences: It is a series of short stories taking place chronologically in and around a house in the Northwoods of Western Massachusetts.  The stories seem loosely connected, beginning with the original construction of the house by a couple escaping from the sever puritan society in Springfield Mass in the 1600s, and continuing through the ensuing four centuries to present day – each story somehow related to the house and/or the property it is on and the characters who lived there.  The final chapters/stories serve to tie the previous stories together. 

My Impressions: Very interesting book – different and I liked it. Not everyone will.  It reads like a series of short stories – and the connection between the stories isn’t always clear – but it’s there. And the message is VERY big picture.  And profound.  But to get that insight, takes patience.  As I read the book, each individual story was interesting,  but I wondered, WTF is this book about?  The good news is that I found the individual stories each compelling in their own way, though I – like I suspect most readers – wondered where they were going, and what they had to do with each other.  In the end, it all came together in what I thought was a very profound way.  

The cover endorsement calls this book “a monumental achievement of polyphony.”  I looked up “polyphony” and it is indeed an appropriate description. Polyphony: “in music simultaneously combining a number of parts, each forming an individual melody and harmonizing with each other.” The individual melodies would be each of the chapters/stories in the book – each a short story unto itself – the harmony only starts becoming evident toward the end of the book.  In the final two chapters – the light came on for me. Each of the stories connects in some way to the old house deep in the woods of western Massachusetts and the generations of people who either lived there, or were somehow associated with it, and how the house played a key, but sometimes subtle role in their lives. 

Additionally, I was surprised several times to turn the page and find a poem – written by a character in the story that I’d just read, reflecting a somewhat different perspective on their story.  A bit disconcerting, but deciding to roll with it, I found the poems interesting, valuable and worth reading. 

The individual stories start in the 1600s and progress chronologically into the 21s century…..and beyond. Stories of:

  • a young couple eloping from Springfield Mass in the mid 1600s. They build the initial hut;
  • a woman abducted by Natives who then risks all to protect them;
  • a man passionate about apples, builds out the house, creates an apple orchard, fights in the Revolutionary War for the English;
  • two sisters (daughters of the apple man) who live in the house together with a co-pendent and toxic relationship;
  • the life of a weevil that decimated the woods;
  • two married men who have a forbidden but intense love for each other;
  • a charlatan seance medium who claims to connect with the dead;
  • a man on a contract to pursue, find, and return an escaped slave;
  • an amateur history buff looking for clues to validate a theory about the area;
  • A mother with a schizophrenic son who is desperately trying to help him;
  • the psychiatrist of that son who is struggling to understand the boy… and the boy’s mother;
  • the daughter of the mother, and sister of the schizophrenic son,  who has to go through the effects of her dead mother, and dispose of her property;
  • a small town police officer who tries to unravel a very strange murder near the house;
  • A woman botanist doing research on spring ephemerals in the area around the house

All these varied stories are tied together, loosely or more intimately to each other and to the house that the original elopers built after fleeing early Puritan-era Springfield, Mass. At different times over the years,  the house is expanded, abandoned, renewed – it seems to have its own character.  And all the stories are tied in one way or another to the “northwoods” that surround the house, and which passively look on as the various dramas unfold over four centuries.

In the process of learning about the lives of the people in these short stories, we learn about the forests of New England, their beauty and vulnerability – to man, the Dutch Elm Disease and the Chestnut blight. A person who loves nature will find much to appreciate in this book – the house is near a small town, but out on the edge of the primeval forests.  The cover of the book has a cougar on it – referred to as a “catamount” – an old word for a cougar. The catamount plays a subtle role in several of the stories – and seems to represent a threat, a subtle darkness or impending ruination that  runs through many of the stories.  But also the catamount is now extinct in New England – as a result of a variety of forces that make up the stories in this book. 

There is also some “magical realism” in this book – some things that happen that surprised me and let me know that the normal rules of life and physics may not apply in the reality this book describes.

Themes that I detected: 

  • There is lots of drama in the small picture – the lives of the people in the stories in the book.  Not so much drama in the big picture, represented by the Northwoods themselves.
  • Nature and the woods have a different draw to different people for very different reasons.  The characters in the stories had very different relationships to the woods that surrounded the house. 
  • Contrast between the ephemeral (the drama in each of the stories) and the long view – the passage of time, change, and evolution over centuries
  • Life and death – are ever-present, but are they truly what they seem?

Northwoods was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for a reason.  Here are two very positive reviews that I read after I’d read the book, and after I’d written most of this review. If you’re interested, these reviewers are much more articulate than I in their praise of the book.  Like I said, it is not a book for someone looking for a classic page-turner, beginning-to-end story.  But definitely interesting, thought provoking, and different.  

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/19/1200166912/book-review-daniel-mason-north-woods

https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2023/09/13/daniel-mason-north-woods-book-review/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Eve in Hollywood, by Amor Towles

Why this book: I saw this book pop up as an opportunity after I had read and enjoyed Towles’ books Rules of CivilityLincoln Highway and Gentleman in Moscow.  Eve was a most interesting character in Rules of Civility who, part way through the story, had decided to leave the chaos of her life in NYC and headed West, but we didn’t hear much more about her thereafter. I was curious about how Towles would write “the rest of the story” on Eve  This novella is no longer available as a stand alone, but I understand that it is included as a novella in Towles’ recent book Table for Two. 

Summary in 2 sentences:  Eve was running away from a confusing and dissolute life in NYC and heading West to start a new life, and ended up in Hollywood.  This book is a series of six short stories in which different aspects of Eve’s character are expressed and manifest in each story –  as to how she handles various interactions and challenges in the rough and tumble “man’s world” of Hollywood in the 1930s.  

My Impressions: I described this book to a friend as a “confection” – short and not too deep, and great fun to read, but don’t look for any great profound message.  I was looking for something light but well written to read between a couple of more demanding reads I was involved with,  found this on my shelf and picked it up. It was a very enjoyable interlude between more substantial reading I’ve been doing.  Eve is a confident and intelligent femme fatal, but with a limp and a dramatic facial scar from an automobile accident (that takes place in Rules of Civility.)  These “flaws” to her beauty add to her mystery and power.  She is not intimidated in the least by the glory, power and glitz of Hollywood. 

It begins in the first person voice of a gentleman on a train heading to California from the East Coast, who is observing this attractive, detached, interesting woman in the dining car.  When the train reaches Chicago, and most of the passengers get off, he overhears her ask the conductor if she can extend her ticket to stay on the train all the way to LA, which of course she then does.   The gentleman eventually strikes up a conversation with her, and after a while,  asks her why she chose to extend her ticket from Chicago to LA.  She responded, “To be perfectly honest, I have no idea.”  That concludes the first story, and tees up the intrigue on her and her adventures in Hollywood. 

Though it appears that Eve and the gentleman may be on the verge of a closer relationship, in the follow-on stories, there is only a vague reference to him, as Eve purposely and confidently strides into the world of Hollywood, of stars and starlets on the make, and rich executives exploiting their power.    Her self-assuredness is obvious; her ‘purpose’ is not – she remains an enigma.   It isn’t quite clear what she’s doing or why, but each story describes her interaction with someone who represents a different facet of Hollywood in the 1930s and she deftly plays the Hollywood game with detachment, amusement, and prowess – like an old pro.  New York City had prepared her well. 

But there is one character who we see in several of the stories – Eve somehow finds herself in the role of guardian/protector of one of Hollywoods promising young female stars who is rather naive and vulnerable in that rather unforgiving world.  The young actress is about to star in a blockbuster film called “Gone with the Wind” and Eve is recruited to become a sort of older sister to a young Olivia de Haviland, who had been sheltered by the studios from the gossip and scandal mongers in the tabloids.  The studios desperately wanted to protect their investment in her image as pure and virginal starlet for the roles she would be playing, and couldn’t afford to have her mixed up with those who were regularly exposed in the Hollywood tabloids.  Eve not only protected her from the tabloids, but also subtly opened doors for her to have fun and experience some of the joys of LA that the studios were keeping from her. 

A few good quotes from the book. I loved Towles’ writing:

  • When she held out the flask, she could see that Olivia hesitated. “Come on, Livvy, even a church bell’s gotta swing, if it’s gonna chime.”
  • In Indiana, a young girl had a good reason to suspect that lists were the foot soldiers of tyranny – crafted for the sole purpose of bridling the unbridled.  A quashing, squashing, squelching of the human spirt by means of itemization. 
  • Pleased by his own poetry, Litsky smiled for the first time in a year. “Ooh,” she replied. “What big teeth you have, Grandma.” Litsky raised his glass in the affirmative and emptied in in her honor.  
  • Olivia extended her arm in an ironic flourish. “Give every man thine ear, but few thy voice….”
  • Olivia: “A lady never finishes a cigarette, a drink, or a meal.”
  • Eve:  “My mother told me that it was more important to be interested than interesting.” Olivia: “Have you heeded her advice?”  Eve: “Only as a last resort.” 

I haven’t read Table for Two by Towles, but if the other stories in it are as much fun as this one, it is certainly wortth a look.   Like I said, a confection, a well written break from heavier fare.   

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Einstein – His Life and Universe, by Walter Isaacson

Why this book: I’ve read and been impressed with three other biographies by Walter Isaacson, Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, and Elon Musk.  Like everyone else, I’d heard of Einstein, but didn’t know much about him other than E=MC-squared.  I listened to rather than read this book 

Summary in 4 Sentences:  This biography starts with what is known about his childhood and family, then his young adult life, 2 marriages, growing career and ultimately becoming a world renowned icon of theoretical physics. Isaacson does a pretty good job of explaining the physics and the various controversies around how sub-atomic particles react and are influenced, as he moves beyond the Theory of Relativity into Quantum Mechanics. Einstein becomes increasingly involved in world politics, pacifism, fighting anti-semitism and authoritarian governments after fleeing Nazi Germany and settling in the United States for the final 35 years of his life. He also stayed very engaged in seeking to refute Quantum theory as an incomplete theory of how matter behaves at the sub-atomic level. 

My Impressions:  Another great biography by Walter Isaacson, pulling back the curtain on a modern celebrity. I listened to rather than read this book, though there were numerous times I’d wished I had the printed copy to mark up and return to sections to review.  While I wasn’t able to follow the esoterica of the theoretical physics that Einstein was involved in, Isaacson made an admirable effort in dumbing it down to what a humanities major, science-challenged reader like me could at least appreciate. But the book gave great insights into how the leaders in the arcane world of theoretical physics interacts – the petty jealousies, disputes – trivial and of substance, the values and personality conflicts and more, that Einstein was involved in from being a very young man until his  death.

Einstein was a life long non-conformist and believed in questioning all conventional wisdom. He would never accept conventional wisdom as an article of faith – he always questioned it and strictly applied common sense – which is ironic, since much of his research and conclusions defy “common” sense.  But his willingness to question and challenge convention him at odds with the “establishment” throughout his life.  He rebelled against any effort to mold his thinking without discourse and logic, and he would never simply push the “I believe” button.  Whereas Harry Truman’s motto was “show me”  Einstein wanted proof – mathematical as well as empirical proof before he would accept a proposition. He had no patience for people who were unwilling to examine or question their own prejudices -and he applied this standard to himself as well. 

We learned that Einstein had a profound faith in the order of the universe based on all of his reasoning and mathematical studies  -that the physical world is as it is and does what it does as a result of immutable laws.  These laws are  “God’s Laws” and are subject to examination and proof.   This faith  that the laws which govern all activity in the universe could be discovered or uncovered by man’s reason was an apriori principle for Einstein, and this fervent believ is part of what drove him to his famous Theory of Relativity.  

This faith in the order of the universe and that nothing happens by mere chance, but in response to causes and effects that can be discovered and understood was Einstein’s apriori principle.  The laws of mathematics helped define the laws of physics. He considered himself a theoretical physicist and lamented that he was not more accomplished and stronger in math – so he frequently called upon colleagues who were extremely strong in math to help him define the physical laws that he instinctively intuited.

Physics. Einstein’s great contribution to physics which he initially intuited and then proved, was the interplay and connection between time, space, gravity and electro-magnetism. I can’t pretend to understand how he developed his theories,  but one of his great contributions to this field was proving that gravity from physical objects bends light waves, proving that matter and light have a connection. He is famous for his General theory of relativity which demonstrates that gravity includes (creates?) warps and curves in space and time, and his  Special Theory of Relativity that concludes that time is not constant, nor is weight or mass. There was much in the book that attempted to explain these theories in simple terms but was more than my ossified old brain could grasp.  But it was interesting to see how the greatest minds struggled to uncover and explore realities and inter-relationships in the universe, at the sub-atomic level, as well as in the grand scope of the universe, that most of us don’t see. 

Einstein’s theories of relativity – general and special – opened the door to Quantum Mechanics by describing for the first time light as quanta, that light behaves like a particle nature but has no mass.  As work and experimentation continued in the field of Quantum Theory, Einstein was troubled by the  conclusion that Quantum theory necessarily included an uncertainty principle – that the behavior of a particle is different, if it is observed, and that how it behaves is a function of probabilities rather than immutable laws.  This uncertainty principle Einstein said, undermined his entire world view, that cause and effect were functions of immutable, and certain laws.  

For the rest of his life Einstein’s “holy grail” was to discover a Unified Field Theory which united his physics of certainty based on immutable laws, and the apparently random behavior of quanta particles in Quantum experimentation. He did not claim that Quantum mechanics was “wrong,” rather that it was incomplete, and his mission in the last quarter century of his life was to find the bridge between Newtonian certainty and Quantum uncertainty.  He called this the “Unified Field Theory” which he never was able to develop or uncover, and nearly a century later is still being discussed, debated, and explored. 

Einstein’s Politics and Humanism:

Pacifism Einstein became a devoted pacifist as a result of the first World War which he essentially sat out. He had a life long aversion to nationalism and patriotic fervor, and was truly an internationalist – having held citizenship in Germany, Switzerland, and the US. This espoused pacifism and internationalism put him at odds with and in opposition to patriotic nationalists wherever he was – in Germany and the US.   J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI kept a large file on him and long suspected him of being a Soviet agent because of his socialist ideals and his internationalism, which Hoover and the FBI misinterpreted as support for communist ideals,  though in fact Einstein was repulsed by Soviet restrictions on individual freedom and expressly criticized the Soviet model.  

Zionism.  Einstein grew up in a non-practicing Jewish family.  As a young man he had renounced religion and was himself a non-practicing Jew, but as he witnessed and experienced anti-semitism in Germany and elsewhere, he embraced his Jewish heritage, if not the Jewish religion.  The  anti-semitism he experienced in Germany drove him to renounce his citizenship and to emigrate to America. He also became an active advocate for Zionism – a Jewish homeland, though he fought the Zionists on their treatment of the Arab’s who lived in the Jewish promised land that became Israel.

Religion. Isaacson writes a beautiful chapter on Einstein’s “religion” – he was not religious but would not accept the label of being an “atheist” – in fact he argued against angry atheists who he saw as merely disillusioned by their religious up bringing. He called himself an agnotic, and believed in what is often called “the God of Spinoza” – an impersonal God of principles beauty and order, which should inspire awe, and love and a good life.  Einstein’s faith in the order of the universe, colored with his appreciation for the beauty of that order, the awe with which he viewed the laws and order and magnitude of the universe – was what allowed him to call himself a man of faith – but he would not accept the existence of a personal God that look out after our interests. 

Family life- women.  Einstein was in some ways a dreamy romantic – not just about physics but also about women.  He was madly in love with his first wife Mileva Maric, a mathematician and physicist who he’d met at university, who he married, very much against his parents’ wishes. They had two children and then things got messy, they separated and eventually divorced. He then married his divorced cousin Elsa – more a marriage of close friendship and mutual support while he also apparently had numerous affairs – but none which he would allow to interfere with his physics nor his marriage to Elsa.  Elsa appaerntly knew of, and reluctantly tolerated some of his dalliances.  Apart from his rather cold treatment of Maric during their estrangement, he treated women well, and even with Maric they eventually become reconciled in parenting their children became friend again, and Einstein always supported her financially. Even in his last years, after the death of his wife Elsa, he had a ‘lady friend’ Johanna Fantova a librarian at Princeton some 40 years his junior, for the last 10 years or so of his life  Ms Fantova  like his two wives before her, played a key role in organizing his life – as Einstein had trouble giving attention to the practical matters of daily living – he needed a woman to help with that because his thoughts and attention were on the Universe and what makes it tick. 

Last Years Einstien worked at the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton the last 30+ years of his life and never returned to Europe. He was active in supporting the allied efforts to defeat the Nazis – the rise of the Nazis changed him from a pacifist to an advocate of military service for defensive purposes only. When Einstein was warned that the Nazis had embarked on a project to develop nuclear weapons, he wrote to FDR and it was at his suggestion that FDR initiated the Manhattan project. He was not involved in the actual Manhattan project itself (he could not get a clearance because of his previous support of pacifism) but knew of it, because he was close friends with Oppenheimer and many others working on the project. After Hiroshima he campaigned to ban nuclear weapons use in war – a futile effort.

When he died in 1955 at age 76, he was one of the most famous men in the world, regarded as a genius by most lay people, but as something of an anachronism by modern physicists exploring the implications of Quantum theory.  He once said that God punished him for his youthful exuberence in challenging authority, by making him and his defense of his ideas of certainty and immutable laws the “authority”  against whom young physicists and advocates of Quantum theory rebelled

Conclusion – For me the most interesting part of the Einstein’s story is his character – always a rebel as a youth, he struggled to be taken seriously, but was confident in his views and wouldn’t hold back his controversial opinions and ideas.  But he was never strident – invited debate, and except for the issue of anti-semitism and patriotic intolerance, he was always polite and genteel.   But in matters of physics and science, he believed in himself and his thought process, and he persisted to find out if his ideas could be proven right.  He did usually eventually succeed in proving himself right – up to and except for his Unified Field Theory. 

Einsteins was never (or rarely) mean and was always respectful in discussing views he didn’t agree with – always believed that personal freedom was built upon believing oneself free to express one’s  opinions whatever they may be, without compulsion.  Always considered a nice if somewhat dreamy man, he was respectful and respected and was not politically dogmatic except in his opposition to war and greed, in opposition to nationalism and aggression, and in support of whatever would support internationalism and humanitarianism.

Fascinating book about a fascinating man who was an icon of the 20th century.  

Posted in biography, Book Lists, Reading, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Whiskey Row Fire of 1900, by Bradley G. Courtney

Why this book: I spend a week or so several times a year in Prescott Arizona where I inherited a vacation home from my parents. Prescott has a fascinating history for someone interested in the Old West, and while there, I picked this book up at the local heritage center – I want to know more about the place where I’m spending more and more time.  One of the things Prescott is famous for is Whiskey Row – which still has several establishments left over from over a century ago.

Summary in 3 Sentences: This short book covers a brief history of the town of Prescott and Whiskey Row which grew up in the 1860s and had already burned down once in 1883.  We learn about the different entrepreneurs who built up the town, the various saloons and other enterprises, and finally about what led to the devastating fire which destroyed not only Whiskey Row, but much of downtown Prescott. The author describes the night it burnt down, how the town responded and then the rapid rebuilding of the whole downtown Prescott including Whiskey Row which has served as the foundation of what Prescott is today. 

My impressions: This is a short book (about 150 pages) by a local historian who has done extensive research into the local history in general, and the fire of 1900 in particular. Not the most compellingly written historical narrative but not bad – his account is a prism thru which to look at how Prescott in particular evolved, but probably how all towns throughout the territories of the West evolved after the Civil War.

Prescott is located in the high desert with climate and other features that made it preferable to the desert town of Tucson – with which it was competing to be the center of the then Arizona territories, and Phoenix, the current capital of Arizona.  Prescott’s population grew when gold was discovered nearby and when the general mining industry established itself in the mountains nearby.  Fort Whipple was also established there  to protect settlers from local Indians.  Naturally with the dominant male population of soldiers, miners, prospectors and new settlers,  Prescott became a center for a culture of saloons and bordellos that thrived and drew more people. Such famous names as Doc Holiday and the Earp brothers spent time there.

The book briefly describes the fire of 1883, but then goes into how the town recovered and was just taking off as a boom town, when the fire of 1900 destroyed the most prominent buildings of downtown. These include not only the low class saloons and boarding houses but also the Palace saloon, the Grandview hotel, regarded as one of the classiest West of the Mississsippi. The author explores some of the myths that have grown up around the fire and validates the most famous of these  – that the long bar currently in the Palace saloon and restaurant was rescued from the original Cabinat/Palace saloons before the fire burned it all to the ground. 

We learn that with fire fighting still rather primitive combined with a shortage of water, and a town built largely of very flammable ponderosa pine (prevalent in the area,)  once a fire got going, it was hard to stop. So the population of Prescott helped store owners and commercial establishments in the path of the fire to rescue key items before the fire inevitably reached those establishments. Fortunately there was an open plaza across the street where these items could be deposited.  The famous bar had been built in San Francisco and shipped by rail to Prescott, just a few years earlier and was the pride of the owners, and probably the whole town. There were many saloons at the time in Prescott, catering to different levels of the social hierarchy, and a booming red-light district right behind the saloons.  The red light district burned down with the saloons.  Temporary tents and building had both up and running within days..  

This little book contains plenty of pictures from that era to augment the narrative and concludes with a satisfying epilogue, noting that the town of Prescott soon realized that the fire had been largely a blessing – in that it inspired a renewal, rebuilding and improvement of the whole downtown area.   The positive frontier spirit of the “Prescottonians” was lauded, for not dwelling on the misfortune of the fire, but immediately getting to work to put Prescott back up on its feet and poised to become a center of business and culture in that part of Arizona.  

Fun little book to read – next time I’m in Prescott (in just a few weeks) there are many places I’ll want to visit and others I’ve already been to, which I will visit with new appreciation.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Life & Death of St Kilda, by Tom Steel

Why this book;  I had read this book over 30 years ago and recall being moved and finding the story fascinating.  On my recent trip to the Inner Hebrides  with my son, my interest in this remote island, nearly 100 miles west of the outer Hebrides,  was renewed. So I purchased it and read it again. 

Summary in 3 Sentences;  This remote small Island has had isolated people living on it for thousands of years, barely surviving in an extremely austere environment.   Recorded history of the Gaelic speaking inhabitants and how they lived only goes back about 300 years and this book is the recognized best source on how those people lived, what led to the decision in 1930 of the 30 or so remaining inhabitants to leave.  And the book concludes with what happened to those who left, how they sought to integrate with a very different world, and how the British and Scottish governments and Trusts have sought to preserve the heritage of this unique island.

My Impressions: As noted, my second time reading this book – the first time over 3 decades ago and I only remember a few things.  – but I do remember how fascinated I was with the descriptions of this ancient Gaelic crofter culture isolated for centuries from the mainstream culture of Britain and Europe.  It was the last remaining hunter-gatherer society in Europe and there are scant records of how these people lived prior to the 17th century when the earliest chroniclers visited.  

St Kilda is the main small island in a grouping of rock outcroppings out int the Atlantic Ocean,  about 80 miles west of the closest land in the Scottish Outer Hebrides, and it’s population varied from at a high point about 140 to less than half that before the final decline and decision to evacuate the island in 1930.  This book describes the culture of St Kilda from the 19th century when mainstream Scotland became aware of St Kilda and Clan MacLeod of Skye assumed proprietorship over the island, which included Clan leader-like responsibilities for its inhabitants.  Archeologists are still finding evidence of human habitation on St Kilda going back a millennia before the first  appearance of St Kilda in Norse records a millennium ago 

The LIfe and Death of St Kilda begins by describing the sad and final exodus of the inhabitants in 1930.  Following chapters explore and describe the culture – how the people lived,  how they lived mostly on the birds they killed in their nesting grounds on the cliffs and rocks on the group of islands.  The author describes their social mores, how it was a very communal society, all sharing in the bounty and the sufferings that came with living on the island.  There are chapters on how the Church of Scotland sent severe ministers to live on the island to ensure that the inhabitants paid humble obeisance to an angry God, and forbade all forms of fun and joy – no dancing, singing, music, etc in the same way our Puritan forefathers forbade any activity that wasn’t working to survive or worshipping the Lord.  Life was hard enough – these ministers ensured that it stayed hard  

The author describes the slow influence that increased contact with mainland society during the 19th century, had on the islanders.  St Kilda eventually was provided a teacher to teach reading and English to the children, and this basic education was augmented by religious education (reading the bible) by the resident ministers.   Reading gave the islanders increased access to newspapers and other books that increased awareness of life beyond St Kilda, along with increasing visits from fishing trawlers, the factor from Skye and eventually tourists interested in this primitive Gaelic culture.  Eventually visitors wanted to buy their goods – knitting and other crafts and items with money, which the islanders had never needed in their barter culture.   Money and its value was new and had a subtle but profound influence.   And as the islanders learned of opportunities outside St Kilda – from stories that visitors shared and from the occasional emigrant from St Kilda who returned to visit, or shared stories in their letters, young people started to leave.  

One chapter that I remember most from when I first read this book was the very high child mortality rate – above 60%.  There were women who’d given birth to 10 babies and lose 8 before being a month old. When medical people on the mainland learned of this, they wanted to find out why and prevent these tragedies, but the islanders, led by their very conservative minister wouldn’t cooperate, believing that these deaths were God’s will, His plan to keep the population within what the island could support, and it was not for man to interfere.  Eventually it was determined that the deaths were caused by how they stored milk for the children, in containers unknowingly contaminated with the bacteria tetanus infantum, and as they gave babies milk from these containers, the children quickly developed tetanus and died within days.   The tragedy of so many babies dying so soon after being born is unimaginable, but it had been going on for centuries and was just assumed by the St Kildans to be simply the way it was supposed to be.  Just as tragic to me is the resistance the minister encouraged to finding out why.  

The book concludes with what happened to St Kilda after the last inhabitants left – the challenges they had in adapting to life on mainland Scotland.  Also,  during the 20th century the British Military built a small station on this remote outpost in the Atlantic for monitoring naval and air activity approaching the UK, and for supporting various exercises and equipment testing.  St Kilda and the ruins of the small village on Hirta has in the last half century become a tourist destination, and is now largely controlled by the National Trust of Scotland in cooperation with the military which continues to maintain a presence there.  The National Trust has refurbished many of the homes that were abandoned, and created a small museum to serve as a monument to the people and culture that once lived there.  Additionally, archeologists are exploring, and turning up evidence of people who lived there during the Iron Age and perhaps before. 

In the various bookstores I visited in Scotland, I found numerous books on St Kilda, but one of the booksellers told me this is the most comprehensive and the best.  Tom Steele first published this book in 1975 after doing extensive historical  research, and also was able to interview many people who had lived on St Kilda before it was evacuated.  He updated the book in 1988 and then, after his death, his relatives gave a final update in 2011.   For those interested in knowing more about St Kilda, there are some impressive videos and short pieces on St Kilda on youtube.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Calum’s Road, by Roger Hutchinson

Why this book:  I was recently on a bike ride with my son Brad in Scotland and we rode on the Island of Raasay, and rode all the way out to Calum’s Road.  I heard the story from our guide, who then bought us this book  My son and I rode Calum’s road – wish we’d read the book beforehand. 

Summary in 3 Sentences:  Calum MacLeod lived in a small village at the north end of the Inner Hebridean island of Raasay with just a few other families.  These families over decades petitioned the Scottish government for a road to lead to their village – which the various bureaucracies involved refused to do. This book is about the life and death of those villages and how one man, Calum MacLeod as a statement of resistance, decided to build the road himself and it took him decades.  

My Impressions: Short and powerful.  Beautifully written – fascinating, sad and joyful to read.  Calum MacLeod and his road on Raasay are a prism through which the author looks at the demise of small villages and crofter culture on remote islands in the Hebrides.  Though the book provides background from the 1800s, this story takes place primarily between the mid 60s and the early 80s of the 20th century.

The story of Calum’s Road is an extreme example of an independent, and powerful personality choosing by his actions to defy a government which doesn’t seem to care about him, his family, his village and way of life.  In Calum’s Road, we learn about the history of Raasay over the previous two hundred years, how the crofters and small villages were repeatedly exploited and abused by wealthy absentee land lords who owned the island, only as a financial investment and cared little for the people who lived there.  Raasay experienced its own version of the Scottish Highland Clearances, when the the great land barons of Scotland drove people from their homes and crofts and depopulated huge sections of Scotland in order to make room for sheep and deer to graze – the deer were hunted by wealthy gentlemen from England, Wales, Scotland who paid well for the opportunity to hunt on the property of the landlords.  The sheep and the wealthy hunting patrons provided easier and more money than dealing with the problems of tenant farmers, and collecting their rents. 

The culture of Raasay was broken into the north and the south of the island – the north end was farthest from the standard ferry landing and received the least support.  Calum lived in the village of Arnish which lay approximately 1 1/2 to 2 miles beyond the one road on Raasay that went from North to South. Those in Arnish and the several villages beyond had to walk and carry their goods on their backs on a path from the end of the road up to several miles to their villages.  This and a number of other factors that made life in the northern portion of Raasay difficult and even untenable, over a several decades led to all of the people in those villages either dying or leaving.  By the time Calum finished his road, he and his wife were the only ones living there.

In Calum’s Road, we hear the voices of those who grew up in and lived in those villages, talking about their lives there, talking about how they purchased food and goods from Skye, worked to make a living by whatever means were available, how they survived, and why the finally left.  They also talk about Calum MacLeod as a man and his project to build the road, on his own, in his spare time.   Calum himself was one of the strongest characters and personalities on north Raasay, and was the one others  looked to for help when they needed it, and was the most engaged in trying to save the villages.  He felt  a strong sense of duty to his community and to his ancestors who had lived and thrived in that part of Raasay, and did whatever he could to preserve that heritage.  We  read about Calum’s unsuccessful efforts over many decades to get basic government services to the villages in that part of Raasay – to include the road. So finally, convinced that the large centralized bureaucracy of the government could not be counted on, he began to build the road himself. 

In fact his building of the road is just one example of his amazing character.  He not only ran his croft, but also had been postman, lighthouse keeper, and fisherman and had a number of other jobs.  He and his brother had previously built a different short road in north Raasay to support the families isolated on the island of Fladda, just off the coast of Raasay.  Calum was an autodidact – he had no education beyond his 14th year, Gaelic was his first and primary language – English he had to learn.   Yet he was widely read, in both languages, wrote many articles and letters to governmental bureaucrats  and the press (all in English) about how the people in North Raasay were not being given a fair shake,  and he rightly predicted that government policies and neglect would lead to the depopulation of a whole section of Raasay.  He twice won awards for his writing and was regularly sought out by journalists for his character and comment.  He became a recognized expert on the history of Raasay – especially of the exploitation of the crofters by wealthy outsiders. But Calum MacLeod was no socialist – had no trust of centralized government.  He was much more of a libertarian, though he would never have identified himself as such.

Eventually his pressure, his notoriety, the positive attention his efforts got in the press had the intended effect, and the government chose to complete the  rough road he’d built with tarmac and other features of public roads, and completed it in 1982.  By that time Calum was in his mid 70s and was pleased that his efforts had paid off, but by that time, he and his wife were the only one’s living in northern Raasay.  Calum passed away in 1988.

The story of Calum’s road is well known in Scotland and a popular Scottish Strathspey is named for it.   On youtube you can meet Calum and get a good overview of Calum’s Road in a very short (4 mins) video  at https://youtu.be/LUh6ROorRUo?si=E6N3Imc_tGEAeipF   Another very short piece with some great pics can be viewed on TikTok at: https://youtube.com/shorts/n9KmJKDYat0?si=A86njZtkny_3Ezrmhttps://youtube.com/shorts/n9KmJKDYat0?si=A86njZtkny_3Ezrm

I really enjoyed this short book – it gave great insight into the how and why Scottish Highland culture has changed over the 20th century.    I just wish I’d read it before I actually rode that road that Calum built. I would have spent more time at the end visiting the abandoned crofts and village just a few yards beyond the end of the road.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Wager – a tale of Shipwreck, Mutiny, and Murder, by David Grann

Why this book: Sent to me by my brother who’d read it and thought I’d like it. He was right.  It was on the NYT best seller list right after it was published in 2023.

Summary in 5 sentences:  In the 1740s, the Royal Navy sent an expedition of several ships around Cape Horn to the Pacific to intercept and capture Spanish vessels carrying gold and other valuables from Peru to the East Indies to trade for silk, spices etc. The ships in the expedition got separated during the storms and tempests at the Cape, and the ship the HMS Wager, though separated and damaged gets around the Cape, but in a follow-on storm wrecks on a remote uninhabited Island off the south west coast of Chile.  Most of the crew survive  the shipwreck, but then have to find a way to survive on the island with little hope of being rescued.  As the heirarchy and discipline of the military chain of command break down, they face the reality that they may not survive.  Ultimately, two different groups from the crew separately are able to make it back to England years later, with very different stories of what happened. 

My Impressions: Fascinating book, thoroughly researched – providing great insight into the royal navy at that time, how sailors became ship’s captains, how expeditions were formed, how captains of ships were selected, and how they commanded their ships.  All of these insights were a prelude to provide greater perspective on how men lived on the ships during a long voyage,  and then the author’s description of the  almost unimaginable challenges and suffering they experienced getting around Cape Horn prior to the shipwreck.

The expedition included six ships and their transit around Cape Horn  (apparently there are multiple ways to get around Cape Horn) was devastating –  all the ships were damaged and lost much of their crews.  Scurvy is a brutal disease and fully 1/4 to 1/3 of the crews of the different ships were lost, either to scurvy or to accidents, partially caused by the debilitated condition of the crews because of it, as they fought to keep their ships afloat in the huge waves and gale force wind they encountered.  It was painful to read about the daily deaths and suffering, and the daily bad news as the expedition struggled to get through.  Though the several of the ships were severely damaged, they persisted and reached the Pacific Ocean.   HMS Wager was the smallest and slowest of the ships,  was separated from the others in the extensive and back to back storms.  The Wager’s captain knew he had to catch up, but after finally getting around the Cape, and before he could reconnect with the rest of the expedition, the Wager was hit by yet another brutal storm and in the fog ran into the rocks on an island they couldn’t see. That’s when Part 2 of the book begins.

The captain of HMS Wager had been injured during the storms and was also ill with scurvy, but survived the wreck and sought to keep the crew together, as they found themselves on a remote beach on a small remote island.   The ship was crushed on the rocks off shore, but was not completely sunk, so the crew was able to use their lifeboats to board the ship and ferry some of the food and equipment ashore to help them survive.  Their situation was dire – it was late fall and cold – they were not far north of the Antarctic circle.  And there was little to nothing edible on the island, so this situation tested their resourcefulness to the extreme.  In addition to the food they were able to  recover from the ship, much of it contaminated with salt water, they were forced to eat sea weed, crustaceans, occasionally fish, celery weeds and a few edible plants they found.  The plant food alleviated the scurvy, but at the time, they didn’t know why.  Now living ashore, they relied on their ship board organization and chain of command to work together to create shelter, find food and meet the new challenges that confronted them.

The captain had not been popular with the crew before the wreck and his moral authority began to diminish as he made unpopular and often unwise decisions.  His gunnery officer, a well respected and experienced seaman became a powerful and respected presence to whom the crew looked for leadership as a counterweight to the captain.  As things looked more and more bleak, discipline continued to break down, and a group of malcontent sailors refused to follow the Captain’s orders.  They broke off to live apart from the main group, but the gunnery officer stayed ostensibly loyal to the captain and sought to keep the discipline intact,   There was conflict between and within the groups and finally, even those who stayed with the captain were questioning his wisdom, his goals, and his leadership.

The gunnery officer was  repeatedly unsuccessful in his efforts to influence the captain to compromise with and support the crew and consider options they were proposing for their ultimate salvation.   Eventually, though he knew it meant being subject to accusations of mutiny and its harsh consequences, the gunnery officer broke with the captain and with a majority of the men on the island, chose to risk it all with an attempt in two of the surviving boats, to return to the Atlantic thru the Straits of Magellan to reach a town in Argentina.  

The story of the breakdown in the captain’s leadership, and the breakdown in discipline and group integrity on the island was fascinating.  The captain was a strict, by-the-book old-school British captain and was loathe to take input from subordinates that might be counter to his desires.  Some of his decisions that cost him credibility with his crew were driven by orders he wouldn’t share with them.   A series of events and actions by the captain cost him his authority and their respect for his rank and position.   The Captain had insisted on strictly following his orders to head north to try to rendezvous with the rest of the expedition; the others thought that was tantamount to suicide and refused his order. 

The majoirty of the remaining crew led by the gunnery officer in two small boats abandoned the captain and headed back to the Straits of Magellan.  They  succeeded to make it through the Straits  though only one boat survived; the other boat and all aboard were lost. The surviving boat, those aboard starving and suffering from exposure, finally and barely reached  a town on the coast of Argentina.  Several died just before and just after their arrival.  They were greeted warmly by the Argentinians, were fed, clothed and aided in their recovery, and eventually made it back to England, where they were received as returning heroes.  They had all assumed that the captain and the small group that stayed with him on the island had perished. 

But indeed the captain and his small team of loyal followers were able to craft a small boat, and with grit and luck, and some help from natives they encountered, over several weeks, succeeded in reaching a town on the coast of Chile.  Upon arriving,  they were immediately imprisoned as enemies of Spain.  But eventually they were repatriated to England, and when they arrived, there was a firestorm of controversy about the mutineers, conflicting testimony about what had happened on the island and eventually, a dramatic court martial.

The gunnery officer who led the mutineers and got them to Argentina, had kept a detailed journal and wrote extensively of his experiences, which was a major source for the author.  Also, one of the junior officers who stayed with the captain, had also kept a detailed journal and later in life wrote a book about his experiences which diverged from those of the gunnery officer after the mutineers left.  The author relied heavily on these accounts,  as well as having done extensive additional research to make a fascinating narrative of life, suffering, death and mutiny in the Royal Navy of the 1740s.

I wish I’d read The Wager before reading The Wide, Wide Sea about James Cook’s 3rd expedition some 40 years later.   Grann’s extensive explanations of the process of putting together the expedition would have been helpful in appreciating Cook’s expedition. Also, though the suffering that the crew endured from scurvy was painful to read,  it also helped me to appreciate how important Cook’s successful efforts to prevent it were on his voyage – forcing the crew to eat vegetables.  Cook’s expedition of nearly 3 years with no occurrences of scurvy was ground breaking for all navies of the world.  

For those interested in nautical history, or how a group can disintegrate under pressure, The Wager is a must read. I have compared the dynamics on the remote island to the Lord of the Flies story, but also to Shantung Compound a book I read a few years ago about how the Japanese isolated and imprisoned westerners who were living in China at the outbreak of WW2, how they broke up into small groups competing with each other for resources, and not accepting any authority. In both cases without positional or institutional authority to compel group compliance, group cohesion break down.  A group needs a Shackleton-like leader to keep it together to survive. 

Also for a bit more detail on the HMS Wager expedition and mutiny, without the detail and drama that Gann’s book provides, the Wikipedia article on Wager Mutiny is good.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

James, by Percival Everett

Why this book: I recently listened to a great audible version of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and was recently reading strong reviews of this revised version of the well known Mark Twain novel.

Summary in 3 Sentences  This is a the author’s re-imagining of Mark Twain’s famous novel written in the first person from the perspective of Jim, the runaway slave who accompanies Huck down the Mississippi River, both of them escaping their lives in 1830s Hannibal, Missouri.  In this book we experience many of the same “adventures” and challenges that Twain describes in the original novel, and additional ones that Everett adds to the original story – all seen from a recreated Jim – one with 20th or 21st century sensibilities.   We see Huck, white society, slave culture, and southern slaveholders and those who accept it from the perspective of a black man with wisdom, education and insight about freedom, human rights and the imperative for blacks to adapt to survive. 

My Impressions:  I wasn’t sure what to expect with this book and early on, I wasn’t sure where the author was going with it, and as I got into it I still wasn’t sure I’d like it.  But the more I read, the more I was pulled in and finally was very impressed with how he used this classic story to tell us a different story. 

In James, Everett creates the character Jim as externally the same (or very similar) to the character in Mark Twain’s novel, but in James, we are inside Jim’s head, and see the world from his perspective,  and this “Jim” has the consciousness and sensibilities of a 21st century educated black man, in the body and situation of an early 19th century slave in the South. It’s almost like a science fiction revision of the original story from Jim’s perspective.

In James, Jim plays the role of the stepin’ fetchit, good hearted, smart but simple minded slave that Twain creates in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and which has been caricatured in the years since.But in James it’s all an act – stressing that that the slave is a much more intelligent, sensitive and thoughtful character, and pretends to be what white people want him to be.  Being seen as simple minded was a tool to ensure their safety – so that whites would not feel threatened by someone intelligent or competent.  For a slave to show any intelligence or individuality or righteous indignation at the way he and other blacks are treated, invited severe punishment or death.  So Jim teaches his children to talk “slave talk” (“yasuh, massah” or “I don know nuttin’ ’bout birthin’ babies”) to protect themselves from whites who would feel threatened by intelligent, thoughtful,  and competent slaves.  In James, slaves spoke slave talk when around whites, but among themselves, spoke as people today would speak.  This “code-switching” – changing speach patterns to adapt to different social settings – was a tool that Everett used to emphasize how blacks were human beings relatable to us among themselves, but played the role that was expected of them by whites, in order to survive. 

The book is filled with the “n” word – necessarily, to ensure that we the readers fully understand the setting. Jim is “nigger Jim” to the whites and is careful to do all he can to be invisible, to not draw any attention, because most attention results in brutal punishment.

James follows the rough trajectory of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Huck both escaping from Aunt Polly, meeting on Jackson’s Island and then heading down the river together on various flimsy rafts, getting involved with “the Duke” and the “King of France “and their fraudulent escapades.  But then James diverges from the Huck Finn story as Jim and Huck get separated and Jim gets involved with a minstrel group, is then sold as a slave, escapes and helps another slave escape, and on his own, secretly returns to Hannibal to reconnect with  his wife and daughter. Jim reconnects with Huck again on Jackson’s Island to get his help, and here Everett departs dramatically from the fairy tale happy ending of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.  Jim then chooses to become the agent of his own destiny.  The conclusion is inconclusive, surprising and very well done.  No spoiler, but while the ending is inconclusive, it is satisfying. 

James provides a valuable perspective on slavery, providing a sober 21st century first person perspective on what it was like to be a slave.  In one of the reviews of this book I read, it states that: “In Twain’s text, Jim is intelligent and honest, but also at times bumbling and the butt of jokes. In James, Jim emerges as a fully developed, multifaceted, and complex character. This is possibly only because he narrates his own story. ”  Huck represents a compassionate innocently naive white person’s perspective on slavery, and one of the themes of the book is Huck’s moral development and rising consciousness about the evils of an institution he’d come to take for granted.  But the majority of white characters in the book represent the prejudices of white supremacists, happily exploiting blacks and slaves. 

James was an engaging and enlightening read – very cleverly using The Adventures of  Huckleberry Finn story which so many of us know, to provide a rich perspective on how slavery felt to the blacks at that time. It was useful for me to have recently listened to The Adventures of Hucklebery Finn to better follow and appreciate Everett’s clever adaptation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment