How Ike Led, by Susan Eisenhower

View Post

 Why this book: Selected by the SEAL reading group I help lead. I listened to rather than read this book.

Summary in 4 Sentences: The author Susan Eisenhower is Dwight Eisenhower’s grand daughter and is an accomplished woman in her own right, and and her book includes personal memories and interviews with close connections she’s had to the people who were important in Dwight Eisenhower’s life and career.  The book is indeed part biographical, touching on aspects of his personal life that shaped his leadership and character, and how he led as a Five Star Army General, as the president of Colombia University, and finally, as President of the United States. She gives chapters to some of the key events and controversies and decisions of his life and leadership – to include Operation Overlord as the Supreme Allied Commander, his decision to run for President, and as President of the United States, which included the final years of the Korean War, the Suez crisis, the nuclear detente with the Soviet Union, the Joe McCarthy hearings, the Berlin Crisis, the U2 incident, the Civil Rights movement, and more.

My Impresssions:  I really enjoyed and learned a lot from this book – much more than I expected. Susan Eisenhower writes very well and provided the right touch of personal perspective to the history she recounted of events of over 70 years ago have shaped the world we live in today. In addition to her personal experiences with Ike, and her extensive research and interviews with those who knew and worked with him, she had access to his diary and letters he had sent to family members.

From David Roll’s review of this book in the WSJ:

How Ike Led is not a biography, history or memoir. Instead, it is a unique story, based upon personal experience, family letters and interviews with Dwight Eisenhower’s close friends and advisers, which describes Ike’s strategic leadership throughout World War II and his eight years as president from 1953 to 1961.”

One of the things that struck me, and I believe will strike any reader of this book today, is how the issues and environment Ike dealt with are not dissimilar from what we are experiencing in America today. For example: the two political parties being drive by their extremes, tensions with Russia and China, Civil Rights, Israel and the Middle East, US credibility in the developing world, the national debt and deficit spending, the press which feeds the flames of popular prejudices and attitudes.

In this book, we get to know Ike personally through the eyes of his grand daughter who grew up in his shadow, and also through the eyes of many of his friends, colleagues, subordinates and others who worked with and were influenced by Dwight Eisenhower.   Susan Eisenhower did her research and in addition to Ike’s diaries and letters, she had read the memoirs of many of the people Eisenhower worked with as well as some of the biographies of him, and brought those perspectives into her book.  One can’t help but wonder if the issues that Ike dealt with which we are dealing with today aren’t a chronic part of the American experience.   It is instructive to read how Ike dealt with them – successfully over two terms, keeping us at peace and initiating many projects that continue to positively impact America.  But it is also instructive to read how Ike was attacked and vilified by his opponents, especially during his second term.

He was not seen as a successful President by many, because he didn’t have the showmanship or charisma to cater to public whims that FDR and Kennedy had.  But over time historians and political scientists have reevaluated him as one of our nation’s most effective Presidents. He wasn’t a showman and publicity seeker – and that was one of his great strengths – he was explicitly focused on dong good, much more so than looking good.  His Stoic values of discipline, integrity and  selflessly serving the greater good of the American People were his primary guide posts.  He and George Washington are probably the two Presidents who most adhered to the principles of life and leadership articulated by Marcus Aurelius in his Meditations.  I am surprised Susan Eisenhower never mentions Marcus Aurelius in her book about her grandfather. 

The main theme of the book was Eisenhower the man and his character, and how that was expressed in how he made decisions of great, and even national existential import.  As we learn about the background behind some of the key events of the 1950s, we see these events through Eisenhower’s eyes as understood by Susan, based on her personal experience and her research.  And we see how these events have shaped our history since then.

Ike decided to enter politics and run for President only after seeing that the other candidates representing the leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties of the day represented the extremes of their parties, and left the “middle way” un-represented.  He used his popularity from WW2 to give credibility to a middle way, and he was able to successfully articulate and advocate for political positions that took some from those on the left who sought to expand social welfare programs, and some from the right who sought to enhance individual freedom and responsibility,  and pull back from international commitments.    Would that we had someone like that today.

Key qualities of Eisenhower’s character that are worth considering and emulating.

  • He was not a grandstander – did not seek public recognition or glory.

  • He devoted himself to the best outcome for all – service to the mission and the whole above personal considerations.

  • He listened and actively sought to understand other peoples’ perspectives

  • He smiled and sought to put people at ease – he liked people.

  • He scrupulously would not take any financial short cuts for personal advantage due to his position.

  • Honesty, integrity and discipline were his guiding principles.

A few of his Leadership Principles or Guidelines that we saw in Susan Eisenhower’s description of how he made decisions.

DO….

  • ….always give others credit

  • ….listen to and understand counter perspectives

  • ….show respect and toward people at all levels of one’s organization

  • ….show a positive and optimistic attitude toward the future, no matter how dire the situation may look

  • ….demonstrate integrity and be the example in following the values you want in your subordinates.

DON’T…

  • ….make a decision until you’ve heard various perspectives on the issue

  • ….make a decision during the discussion – withdraw, consider, then decide

  • ….actively alienate people whose support you may need -especially your opponents.

  • ….get angry in public

IN THE EPILOGUE Susan Eisenhower’s reflects on how she believes that today, there is a hunger for someone of Ike’s character and style of  leadership to bring the country back together and bridge the gap between the extremes on the right and left that are tearing our country apart.  She recognizes that the 24 hour news cycle has amplified the effects of angry diatribes from each side, but that most of America would welcome the approach and values that Ike represented. The audiobook effectively concluded with a recording of Ike’s farewell address to the country at the end of his Presidency.

MY CONCLUSION.  There is perhaps a bit of hero worship in Susan Eisenhower’s reflections on her grandfather, but i bought into her version of her grandfather and his place in history.  Though Susan addresses many of Ike’s critics and those who strongly disagreed with his policies, she essentially defends him, and from my perspective, does so quite well.  As a retired military officer myself, I have been brought up with most if not all of the same values of service as Ike:  Take care of the mission; Take care of the troops.     At the  Naval Academy we taught what we called the “Constitutional Paradigm” developed by Colonel (USMC) Paul Rousch which calls for the following hierarchy of  values: 

  1. follow the US constitution,
  2. fulfill the mission;  
  3. do what’s good for one’s service/organization;
  4. do what’s good for the ship/command/team;
  5. take care of your shipmate/partners;  and then finally
  6. take care of oneself .

That however may be too simple a formula to always work in a free society when leaders are struggling to protect the good of the many from extremely clever and self-serving adversaries who are able to manipulate the public and the system to achieve their personal aims.   Ike did very well at following his sense of honor and integrity in a system which put those values to the test regularly, by people and institutions more focussed on power, personal goals, expediency and fulfilling ephemeral public demands. rather than on the principles of democracy and the greatest good for the whole, over the long term.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Deacon King Kong, by James McBride

Why this book: Selected by my Literature reading group after the strong recommendation of Patsy, who has yet to let us down with a book she strongly recommends! 

Summary in 3 Sentences: Deacon King Kong is the nickname for an old black man in Brooklyn in the late 1960s when the neighborhood is in the middle of a drug war between several different gangs cashing in on the very lucrative heroin trade.  The story includes colorful characters from the poor urban underworld of that era – the poor Italians, the poor blacks, the Irish cops, and the places and manner where those three cultures clash and cooperate.  It’s a fascinating story, with fascinating characters which shines a light on a time and place in NYC culture when it was in transition.

My Impressions: I enjoyed and learned a lot more from this book than I expected.  I listened to it, which served me well, as Dominic Hoffman, the reader, did well in performing the various roles and voices that arose in the story. He helped make the characters real and believable and the story had enough drama and even a bit of fairy tale in it to keep me engaged.  I’ve already recommended it to several friends. The book has been widely recognized, won several awards, and is an Oprah pick. 

The story begins with the book’s unlikely protagonist known in the neighborhood as “Sportcoat” drunk and trying to kill “Deems,” a young man who is plying his trade selling drugs to other young people on a corner in the neighborhood – the projects in Brooklyn.  Everyone sees the attempt but Sportcoat only woulds Deems,  as Deems turns his head at just the right time.  Sportcoat was so drunk he doesn’t even recall trying to kill Deems, and his drinking buddy “Hot Sausage” is astonished at the stupidity of the act and tries to convince Sportcoat that he needs to leave town, in order to avoid being killed in revenge, either by Deems or Deems’ drug bosses or friends.  At this point in the book I’m not so sure what i’ve gotten myself into – maybe  “Amos ‘n Andy” in ‘the hood.

‘But the story rapidly evolves and gets better and better.

Sportcoat’s attempted murder incites a mini-drug war between Deems’ boss, and another drug lord who wants that territory.  Then, into that drama comes “the Elephant,” an Italian smuggler who works in the neighborhood but on the fringes of the Italian Malia, but is not in the drug business.  We get to know all of these criminals as human beings, doing what they can to survive and play by whatever rules will keep them alive in the battle for illicit gains in the underworld of Brooklyn.

We then get to know the Irish cop who is assigned to sort all this out, who after a long career policing in New York and Brooklyn is only months away from retirement, and doesn’t want to get in too deep and put his retirement in jeopardy.   One of his main connections in the hood is the wife of the pastor of the church where Sportcoat is “the Deacon” and their friendship adds a different human dimension to the story. 

McBride brings so many fasicnating characters into this story that it truly was a joy to listen to it.  He takes us back to a simpler time – when most of the blacks in Brooklyn had grown up in the world of racism and limited opportunity in the rural South, and then migrate north to NYC in hope of a better life.  These former farm workers, sharecroppers, laborers and household help from the South form a tight community where people look out after and take care of each other, and yet squabble like family.  We get insights into the charm and pettiness of church life in a poor section of Brooklyn and the many eccentric characters who gave that neighborhood its character and personality.

Our protagonist “Sportcoat” is hard to take seriously at first, but the more we get to know him, the more we see that there is to admire. He has an ongoing relationship with his wife Hettie, who is a constant in his life, and their relationship evolves throughout the book, even though she’s no longer living.  Sportcoat talks to her and she answers him, chastises him, gives him advice, and he argues with her – until she gets mad and leaves him alone.  Until she comes back.  Sportcoat’s relationship with Hettie adds color, depth and humanity to how we understand him, and how he deals with the challenges that he brings on to himself. 

And as we get to know each of the colorful characters in this book we come to admire them in spite of their eccentricities and failings.  McBride is sympathetic and compassionate toward the characters in the book – each doing what they can in a difficult and often ugly environment.   Whereaas we might laugh at or look down on the eccentricities, the naivete, sometimes poor judgment of the characters in this book, I couldn’t help but see McBride’s approach as celebrating these eccentricities and differences in perspective and lifestyle.  This is what made this book so much fun to read/listen to.   McBride brings out the ridiculous and the sublime in each of his characters. 

The second half of the book includes a mystery and a treasure that bring a number of these chareacters together in unanticipated ways, and adds more fun and drama to this story. 

Deacon King Kong is an entertaining and insightful way to get in a culture and lifestyle that was a key part of American when the rest of the country was watching the moon landing, the War in Vietnam and the disfunction of Washington Politics. 

Highly recommended and deserving of its many accolades.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Matrix, by Lauren Groff

Why this book:  Suggested by a good friend. I listened to it on audible.

Summary in 4 sentences. Setting is 12th century England where a young teenage girl related to the Queen is not legitimate, born after her mother is raped, and also not considered attractive enough for a politically advantageous marriage  – consequently she is exiled to a poor and struggling abbey in Northern England.  The story is of her life, as she matures into adulthood and her spiritual growth in that very austere setting of the poor abbey, where she eventually rises to  become the Abess of the Abbey and develops it into one of the wealthiest and most highly renowned Abbeys in England. It is a book about a women leading women nuns in the primitive world of medieval England, with few advantages except their wits and their sense of community. It is also about spiritual growth and resourcefulness for women leaders in the face of adversity.

My Impressions: This is very different from my normal reading fare – in that in Matrix, men are only peripherally mentioned and play little role in the book, except as foils to the ambitions of the lead character.  Also the setting was new to me, as I was unfamiliar with much of the terminology that describes life in a convent in the middle ages.   The English accent of the reader took me to England, though in fact, at that time and place, educated people spoke Latin and/or French and the uneducated spoke a form of English that would be unrecognizable to us today (think Chaucer).  The title Matrix refers to the late Middle English word for “womb” which comes from the Latin root “matri..” meaning mother. 

The protagonist Marie is loosely modeled after what little is known of  Marie de France, a remarkable female poet who lived in the same period.  The character of Eleanor of Aquitaine, once Queen of France AND Queen of England, and imprisoned for 16 yrs by her husband then King Henry of England and mother of Richard the Lion hearted,  is a much better known historical figure and her character in the book fits with what is known of her,  (Katherine Hepburn plays her in the movie “Lion in Winter”)

Matrix the book starts out pretty bleak – the main character Marie felt abandoned and banished against her will to an impoverished abbey several days travel from anything she knew. When she arrived at the abbey, she she faced many challenged in adapting and was miserable for the first year or so, dealing with the poverty, rigid discipline, and privations.   But as the story progresses, Marie adapts to the physical discomfort, becomes stronger, assumes more responsibility and grows into her role as sub-prioress.  She brings her strength of will and intelligence to bear in improving the circumstance in the Abbey. 

Indeed much of what I found most interesting was how these women lived together,  cooperated, squabbled, were resourceful and clever and survived without men in a hostile world, while devoted to poverty and chastity and each other  After many years, Marie was eventually selected to become the Abess to lead the abbey, and continued to  help them to thrive, in part in spite of her many challenges,  in part because of them.  They lived  apart from but in cooperation with the secular world in a nearby village.  The abbey included oblates (young people sent there by their parents to be educated), novice nuns, nuns and nuns of various positions and responsibilities within the hierarchy of the abbey, such as the cook, the gardeners, the veterinarian, and some who had specific practical skill in bookkeeping, construction and maintenance.

Marie is the central figure of the book and her character, her growth and ambition – both worldly and speiritually – are the main themes of Matrix.  Initially she is angry at being exiled to what she regarded as an impoverished stinking mud hole of an abbey.  Then she decided to make it better, and became engaged in projects to improve her own life and the lives of the other nuns there.  Her intelligence and ambition in this regard earned her more responsibility and more avenues for her ambition to excel and lead, and to not be a victim.  After she became abbess of the abbey she was clearly the strongest figure in person and in position in the abbey, and eventually very prominent in the region, as her ambiton and initiatves earned the abbey more and more wealth, resources and respect.  Under her leadership the once hungry and even emaciated nuns became among the best fed people in the region.

Marie claimed to get her wisdom and power from messages given to her in her visions and messages from the Virgin Mary. These visions inspired projects which enhanced the wealth, power, and reputation of the abbey, but were also controversial within the community of nuns as well as within the Catholic Diocese. Her initiatives were unorthodox and some considered even heretical, and were resisted by many within the abbey, but she always prevailed.

Groff’s novel also addresses the sexuality of the nuns including Marie, who found outlets for their physical desires through regular erotic experiences with each other, considering natural and not sinful, but a gift of God, as it was not fornicating.  Sex between men and women appeared to be regarded as a necessary evil necessary to bear children in the secular world,  but sinful and an abomination outside of marriage. In fact I almost got the impression that for Maria and the nuns in the Abbey, men in general were considered to be among the primary sources of sin and temptation, and except for their necessity for child bearing, not  particularly useful or appreciated.

At the end of her life Marie realizes the limitations of her power, and that all of her earthly achievements and all that she had built would change and eventually crumble, and there was nothing she can do about it.  She reaches a point of acceptance and resignation.  The nuns in the abbey were awed and intimidated by her, and divided as to whether she had been a saint or a witch.  The prioress who succeeds her was also intimidated by Marie and as abbess, would be more conservative and obedient to the male-dominated church hierarchy, and intended to put the abbey back on a more traditional path.

Marie’s strong will, power and achievements will appeal to 21st century Western readers who have become comfortable with female leadership and power, and their resistance to the limitations of male-dominated hierarchies. 

Did I enjoy Matrix?  I found  the set, setting and characters interesting and provocative, and Marie in particular, impressive and in fact, inspiring.  Matrix provides a fascinating look at the culture inside of a 12th century Abbey, a world of all women.  And Marie is a fascinating character – a strong, wise, compassionate and courageous woman, with a deft political sense, and a dash of rebellious bubris.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain

Version 1.0.0

Why this Book I’ve been wanting to read this again for quite a while. Read it in Jr HS and didn’t care for it. Also all the fuss about the new book James about this adventure from Jim’s perspective reanimated my interest. 

Summary in 4 Sentences. In order to escape his abusive father, Huck fakes his death and takes a raft down the Mississippi river, and in the process runs into a runaway slave Jim, who Huck knew pretty well as he had been the slave of Ms Watson his fomer guardian.  Jim ran away after hearing that Ms Watson had planned to sell him in New Orleans which would take him away from his family for good.  As they go down the river they have a number of adventures, most notably after linking up with a couple of fraudsters who are preying on isolated communities along the river. One thing leads to another and eventually Tom Sawyer shows back up after Jim is captured and being prepared to to be sold,  and Huck and Tom scheme to help him escape. 

My Impressions: I enjoyed this book immensely – and am glad I chose to listen to it – and would recommend the Elijah Woods performance on Audible as part of  Audible’s Signature Classics (pictured)   Wood reads it in a what seemed to me to be a convincing rendition of the accents of the time, both for Huck, Jim and the many characters they come across in their adventures.  His reading and accents bring the characters and the story to life, and made for a compelling re-experience of this story.  I finished it in about a wee, just commuting and a bit on my bicycle.  

It was  uncomfortable hearing the N word used so regularly and comfortably in the book – apparently 200+ times.  That was the one word used in that time and place to refer to black people.  Racism was simply an accepted part of the culture those people were born into in that part of the South.  Huck was morally confused about what he’d been taught was the wrongness – illegality – of helping a fugitive slave.  He felt guilty about breaking the law, and that guilt was at odds with his sense that Jim was a good man who deserved his freedom.  Helping runaway slaves was an egregious offense at the time and he had to hide or make other excuses for being with a black man on his journey down the Mississippi.

Twain used this book to satirize a number of common practices in the book including slavery and the dehumanization of blacks.  He used Huck’s basic goodness, common sense and practical approach to problem solving to poke fun at people and practices that don’t hold up under scrutiny.  Twain’s wit is particularly vicous against arrogant and pretentious people – and especially against the “Duke” and the King of France that Huck and Jim encounter on their trip down the river. Twain is also unsparing in his satire of the gullibility of the hard working simple folk in the small towns along the river, but he gives them their dignity back when they respond viciously, when the realized they’d been had.

Late in the book, when Tom Sawyer  rejoins Huck and Jim, Tom’s romantic idealism provides more fodder for Twain’s humor, as Tom constantly comes up with absurd plans to fulfill his romantic fantasies about ‘the right way’ plan and conduct an escape, or an adventure or what have you.  His proposals make no sense to the reader, nor to Huck, nor to Jim, but Tom is so persuasive and claims to have a much more sophisticated view of life, that Huck and Jim acceded to most of his crazy plans. 

This is the announcement of this version of Huck Finn on Audible, and I strongly recommend it as an enjoyable way to re–experience this classic. “Audible is pleased to announce the premiere of an exciting new series, Audible Signature Classics, featuring literature’s greatest stories, performed by accomplished stars handpicked for their ability to interpret each work in a new and refreshing way. The first book in the series is Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, performed by Elijah Wood.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Jersey Brothers – a Missing Officer in the Pacific and His Family’s Quest to Bring Him Home, by Sally Mott Freeman

Why this book:  My wife read this and was really impressed – she rarely gushes about a book,  but she gushed about this one, and when she gushes, I listen and try to read the book. She bought copies for many of her friends. So I put it in my cue and listened to it. Glad I did. 

Summary in 3 Sentences:  This is the story of three brothers, all in the Navy and at different places working for different organizations during WW2 in the Pacific.  One brother was working in FDR’s White House, one was on the Enterprise and a third was in the Philippines  and became a Prisoner of War. The author is the daughter of one of these brothers,had acces to all their correspondence, and creates a unique lens through which to view the war in the Pacific through these three individuals – who were like the Forest Gumps of the Pacific War – it seems one of them was wherever many of the most important events took place, and we experience those events through their eyes.  Much of the story is about the efforts of two of the brothers to find their youngest brother who was a prisoner of the Japanese, while we also experience the brutal conditions of his captivity – as bad or worse than concentration camp victims in the Holocaust. 

My Impressions: Loved this book. It was a great ride through an important and tumultuous time in American History.  The author gives us a well researched history of certain aspects of the War in the Pacific through the eyes of three brothers, each a naval officer but participating in, experiencing and contributing to our victory from very different positions. Through their eyes I learned about important aspects of the war with which I’d been previously unfamiliar. 

It begins with the story of a well-to-do family in New Jersey with two brothers from their mother’s first marriage, and one from her second, all three attending the Naval Academy, two of them graduating with commissions – the third leaving, beginning a second career, but getting commissioned at the outset of the War.   One brother Bill is involved with intelligence in Washington DC and gets called upon to create and run FDR’s famous Map Room which kept track of what US military forces were doing around the world.  The other brother Benny became a weapons officer stationed on the USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier which happened to be outside of but approaching Pearl Harbor when the Japanese attacked on 7 December 1941  The third and youngest brother Bart was a supply officer stationed in the Philippines when the Japanese attacked Manila right after they hit Pearl Harbor. . 

This third brother Bart is wounded in the Japanese attack on Manila and was in the hospital and eventually taken prisoner by the Japanese when they occupied Manila.   With his capture, the trajectories of the lives of these three brothers during the war take off – and Sally Mott Freeman’s story bounces from one to the other, providing different but complimentary perspectives on how the war affected differnt people in the Navy, supporting the war effort in different but unique roles.  She was able to use her extensive access to family letters and  diaries and her research into naval archives to create a fascinating, you-are-there narrative.

Bill and Benny are very engaged in playing their key roles in the war, and the author describes their persspectives and experiences with depth and feeling.   Bill sees the war from the macro strategic perspective in FDR’s white house,  and from his key position, interacts with key leaders in the US government and our allies.  We get Benny’s perspective on board the USS Enterprise as a weapons/gunnery officer returning the day after Japan’s attack to a burning and devastated Pearl Harbor, and then we are with him in the Navy’s reaction to that attack with Enterprise involved in the launching of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, then the Battle of Midway and eventually Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa.  

Eventually after several years, the two brothers essentially trade places.  Benny is burned out from being in constant battle in the Pacific and requests shore duty to recover, and so is sent back to the East Coast.  Bill requests a break from the 80-90 hour weeks of staff work in Washington, and his request is granted to join the naval war at the front.  Soon after Bill arrives, Admiral Kelly Turner, one of the key admirals in the Pacific Fleet requested Bill as an Aide de Camp where he serves out the remainder of the war.  From Bill’s perspective with Adm Turner,  again we see the war from a unique and strategic perspective. Bill was the author’s father and so she personally heard many of the perspectives he shared about the Pacific war from that perspective. Her father remained in the Navy after the war and eventually became head of the Navy’s JAG corps. 

But much of the book was about younger brother Bart and the experience and plight of the Japanese held PoWs in the Philippines. The Japanese were notoriously cruel to allied prisoners, in part due to their belief based on the code of Bushido for which it is the height of dishonor to surrender or to be captured alive. Accordingly the Japanese treated allied PoWs as  dishonored and less than human. Bart was moved to several different Pow camps, while Bill and Benny constantly  sought to find out first, if he was alive, and  second where he might be, in case a rescue may have been possible. 

Important players  in the book were the mother and father of the three brothers -especialy their mother Helen.   Bill and Benny were her sons by her first marriage; Bart was her son by her then current husband, was her youngest and favorite. In her constant efforts to learn the fate of her son, she represented the many thousands of mothers who helplessly waited for news of their sons at war. But Helen did not passively wait for word – she constantly wrote letters to congressmen, imploring them to do more, including President Roosevelt and senior Navy staff.  She was involved in whatever efforts she could to provide support to soldiers and sailors on the front. Her pressure on Bill and Benny to do more to find and perhaps help their younger brother added to their own war stress as well as their anxiety for the well being of younger brother Bart. 

This is the story of a unique family, written by the daughter of one of the principle players in the family drama. But it is also a very human look at the Naval war in the Pacific through the lives of Benny, Bill, Bart and Helen Mott.   Sally Mott Freeman has not written a dispassionate history of the naval war in the Pacific, but in writing about her family’s participation in that war, has put a very human face and dimension to this war that is slowly fading  from memory, as those who fought it are rapidly passing away. 

I have thanked my wife for so strongly urging me to read this book. I highly  recommend it. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Tom Lake, by Ann Patchett

Why this book: I’d read and really enjoyed Ann Patchett’s Bel Canto and had read a couple of good reviews of this book. I listened to it on audible.

Summary in 4 Sentences: Told in first person from a mature woman in her late 50s spending time with all three of her grown daughters who had to leave school/work during the pandemic to return home to the cherry farm in Michigan where they’d grown up.    As they all work together on the farm, the daughters are eager to learn about their mother’s (our protagonist) past when she had had an affair with a man who’d become an A-list  famous movie star.  In Tom Lake, she shares with the reader what she shares with her daughters, as well as what she doesn’t share with her daughters, and her perspectives on life looking back on that exciting and romantic period, how she views her daughters and her life now – her marriage to a man who she loves and is solid but not nearly as exciting as her former lover.  It is a meditation on life from a wise woman looking back on her decisions, her life, and her very different relationships with her daughters.

My Impressions: Not my normal fare, and some would call this a “chick” book,  given that the protagonist and most of the key characters are women, and it deals largely with a woman’s life and perspectives – men play a supporting role in the book.  But I not only thoroughly enjoyed Tom Lake,  but also  very much appreciated the perspectives this book gave me on women, their wisdom, priorities and values, coming  from this very admirable main character.   

This is Lara Wilson’s story, about her growing up and becoming a young actress in her 20s playing Emily in a performance of Thornton Wilder’s Our Town, in a fictional theater in Michigan known as Tom Lake.  During this period she has a passionate romantic tryst with the male lead in the play. The story goes back-and-forth between her youthful experiences in Tom Lake to the “present” day, when she is a married empty-nester in her late 50s, living with her husband on their farm in Michigan, telling her story to her grown daughters who are eager to hear about their mothers romantic adventures.   The audible is read by Meryl Streep who does a remarkable job, convincingly embodying in her voice the woman she is representing.  

The Our Town story is a constant sub-theme in the book – Patchett writes it almost assuming her readers are familiar with the story.  And Tom Lake has it’s analagous themes to those in Our Town – the joys of family and community, the joys and pains of life and romantic love from the perspective of a young girl. Our Town won the Pulitzer Prize for drama in 1938. 

Tom Lake is also a coming of age novel, but later in life.  We learn how Lara gains maturity from the joys and trauma of  her romantic experiences as a budding young actress, to then choosing to leave that world behind and opt for a more stable and simpler life, living on and working a cherry farm in upstate Michigan with her husband, raising three girls. 

The setting of the novel is later Lara’s life, during the pandemic when her three daughters return home to spend the COVID shut-down on the cherry farm they grew up on with family, and the whole family is once again together, working the farm – because Covid restrictions don’t allow the normal seasonal laborers to be there.   During their work, the daughters begin inquiring about their mother’s earlier life and they want to know more about an affair she had had with another actor who subsequently became one of the top and most famous male actors in America. Think Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise. .  

In Tom Lake, Lara is her telling us her story, and we read what she tells her daughters, what she’s thinking as she tells her story and she shares with us what she doesn’t or won’t tell her daughters. She shares why she leaves some parts out,  and how each of her daughters reacts very differently to different parts of her story.  We are inside her head, and we come to see how she regards and relates differently to each of the daughters, who are indeed very different. And most importantly, we see how 30+ years of life and maturity change her perspective on what was so urgent to her as a young woman.

And just when I thought I’d figured out the story and it’s trajectory, Patchett throws in some surprises that catch me a bit off guard, even decades after the tumultuous passionate romance between Lara and Duke.

I really enjoyed the characters in the novel – all seemed legitimate and realistic:

  • Lara Nelson – She is the best developed of the characters; the entire story is told from her perspective and we see it all through her eyes.  An intelligent woman with a wisdom and maturity that has come through some tough lessons learned in her youth, some of which she relates to her daughters, and what she doesn’t tell them, she tells us. 
  • Peter Duke – the extremely charming, gifted, talented, narcissistic and self-serving male heart throb of Lara’s youth.  I couldn’t help but like him – nor could Lara resist, nor could most women – but he was a slave to his charm and talent, and his seeming ability to get whatever he wanted.
  • The three daughters: Emily Maisie, Nel who loved and bickered with each other and played off of each other in getting their mother to tell her story. Emily is hard-core and pragmatic, but has some baggage with her mother, and will take over the farm; Maize is on her way to becoming a veterinarian, and Nel wants to be an actress and can’t believer her mother walked away from the opportunities she had in Hollywood. .  
  • Sebastian Duke:  Peter’s brother who protected Peter (from himself and his sometimes excessive exuberance, also talented and good looking, but a truly nice guy, selflessly helping others – the counterpoint to Peter’s self-absorption. 
  • Joe Nelson: Lara’s husband, who during Lara’s tryst with Peter Duke, had been the director of the play Our Town, and then had the role of stage manager in the play.   Joe was a quiet, solid, mature, admirable, and ultimately stabilizing presence in the novel.  

Some key themes that I saw. 

Love – the fiery passion of youthful, hormone-driven infatuation contrasts with the steady flame of a more “mature”  persistent love, companionship and partnership of long term marriage – to include paternal love for children. This book also touches on the regrets and painful residue of a broken heart – how the wounds of disappointed love can heal over time, as we get older,  but not completely.

All that glitters is not gold – especially in Hollywood.  Lara spent some time in the limelight in Hollywood as a supporting actress in a movie which did pretty well.  She ultimately didn’t like the Hollywood scene, and was able to see through the hype, manipulation and marketing behind much of tinseltown.  We see in Duke and a couple of others in the book,  that the glamour of Hollywood can draw people driven by a yearning need for the power and attention that comes with stardom.  Through Lara we get insights into the pathology behind much of the pursuit of fame and celebrity that drives Hollywood.

The joys and challenges of living on a farm, and the attachment that farmers and their families have to the land that their forefathers cleared and worked. And to small communities where people take care of each other.  Lara’s exciting and romantic past is regularly contrasted with her love of the simple stability and peacefulness of life in a rural community, with close connections to and inter-dependency with people in that small community. 

The simple beauty of nature is juxtaposed against the fast paced urban, impersonal and anonymous life in the cities where Lara has works – LA and New York.  She often returns to the theme of the simple and therapeutic beauty of nature. 

This book won’t appeal to everyone – it is a quiet book without a lot of excitement or drama.  But I thought it was a great story, very well told which shares wisdom and insights from an admirable mature woman.   I recommend it to thoughtful readers who don’t necessarily need a Bourne Identity type of drama in their reading. 

I”d recommend a couple of other reviews of Ann Patchett’s  Tom Lake:  The New Yorker  review.   New York Times review,  The Washington Examiner  review  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Demon Copperhead, by Barbara Kingslover

Why this book: Selected by my literature reading group. Pulitzer prize winner for literature for 2023. Also we had read (I twice)  Kingslover’s book The Poisonwood Bible and loved it.

Summary in 3 Sentences: A novel written in the first person  retrospective from a young man who has grown up among the rural poor of Appalachia in western Virginia, looking back on his  life from his boyhood living in a trailer with his drug addicted mother through teenag years and young adulthood.  He shares with us the abuse he’d taken from his mother’s boyfriend then husband, then uncertainty and emotional trauma as a foster child, then as a runaway, and finally as a teenager in High School, who’s fallen into the same pattern of drug addiction and self-defeating behavior that is the norm in his community.  All the while, we see that he has a good heart, and a maturity of perspective that belies his bad decisions and the bad luck he’s experienced,  and there is always an undercurrent of hope and the possibility of redemption throughout the novel.  

My Impressions:    Not only a good read, it is also powerful and (at least to me) authentic exposure of  a part of life in America that I have never personally seen nor experienced.  It is a “bildungs roman” – a coming of age novel taking place in the 1990s and early 2000s in economically disadvantaged and backward part of western Virginia (Jonesville in Lee County – a real place).  From the perspective of this one rather precocious young man, we learn about life in a part of America that is largely forgotten or ignored by mainstream media and the state and federal bureaucracy.  

Demon Copperhead is the nickname given to Damon Fields who has had few positive adult role models  – most adults he knows have little money, little faith in the future or in the state, many are alcoholic and making a living in the gray or shadowy parts of the economy.   They fieel dismissed and disenfranchised by the more well-to-do parts of American society, and feel left on their own to get by and find whatever fun or satisfaction they can.  Demon loses his mother and is put into a series of foster homes, of people who accept foster children simply for the money the state gives them.  Demon is exploited, made to do excruciating work on a tobacco farm, is emotionally and physically abused, and given very little of what a child needs to grow and flourish. But he learns to survive and learns a lot of resilience.  

We learn about how ineffective the DSS (Departmetn of Social Services) can be in under resources parts of our country to monitor and support foster children and others who are adrift in society – underpaid, overworked social workers are not held accountable by their underpaid, under qualified and overworked supervisors, who are also not held accountable in a system which is more focused on meeting minimum standards, less on effective action, and does not reward success or creative solutions. Even those individuals who try hard are stymied by too much work, too little pay, few incentives to work hard, an initiative-stifling bureaucracy, poor leadership, and an extremely difficult job.

Demon does have some adult supporters and mentors,  but they are not family or parents  – his adult supporters can only encourage him, but there is no one who he trusts or who has authority to hold him accountable. So he falls prey to the connivers and exploiters and low-lifes that look for vulnerable youth to support their own self-serving and corrupt agendas.

Eventually Demon becomes a teenager, gets involved with girls, sex, alcohol and drugs, high school shenanigans – all of which divert him from a path that would take him out of this cycle of failure and despair, and away from opportunities to grow and prosper.  An important factor in his bad behavior is that he doesn’t believe he can break out of the cycle that most of the youth he knows is in  – no one he knows has, and it is so easy to fall prey to all the incentives and opportunities he experiences take him the other way.  All along the way, he sees and becomes familiar with sexual exploitation, violence, suicide, drug overdoses – and the many tragedies that are commonplace in the world he inhabits,  but are much less common in the schools and upbringings of the middle and upper classes of society.

But there is redemption.  Demon does experience love from his neigbbors and two of his teachers who are there for him when he begins to realize that he is going over a cliff. He has a few close friends who retain faith in him, in spite of his  bad judgment and series of bad decisions.    Eventually the light begins to come on and when he is at one of his lowest points, he makes a fateful and difficult decision to try to take a step in a new direction.  

One of the important themes of the book is how the medical establishment encouraged use of and ultimately addiction to oxycontin, calling it a wonder drug against pain, and not addictive.  Demon becomes addicted after a football injury and then slides into the underworld and blackmarket of oxy-junkies bargaining and trading and dealing in illicit oxycontin and fentanyl.  As hard as he tries to free himself, his physicl pain, the addictive qualities of the drug,  and his environment conspire against him.

Another important theme of the book is how the rural poor, the people of the so called “red neck” culture of the Appalachians are disrespected,  disregarded and disenfranchised by much of America.  Demon sees how the poverty and underachievement of today is the result of decades of coal barons readily exploiting local miners, how they bought up property at fire-sale prices, undercut safety and social services and any other obligations to support the miners that might detract from their exorbitant profits.  Demon has a gift for drawing and has some success creating a syndicated cartoon which satirizes the way the wealthy exploit the poor and how the rest of America looks down upon rural and poor Appalachian culture.

There is also a tribute to rural living, the connection with nature, the simple joy and pleasures of the quiet and serenity of the outdoors, in contrast to the hectic urban environment of Nashville and Chattanooga where Demon also spends some time. and even Atlanta, where he went to rescue a friend who’d been seduced there with drugs and other threats.  These urban centers of activity and ambition are contrasted with the comfort and peace that Demon feels in the outdoors in nature. 

The trajectory of the book is explicitly modeled on Dickens’ David Copperfield. In reading a review of that book, I realize that Kingsolver unashamedly uses names for some of the characters in David Copperfield in Demon Copperhead. And given that David Copperfield had a hopeful ending, I knew that somehow Copperhead would too.   Though not a classic “happy ending” it is hopeful and I liked the way she concluded the book.

One of he things that impressed me about the book is the language that she used – sexual, profane, politically incorrect – representing the way I would imagine young people in that part of rural Virginia actually speak.  We read language somewhat different from how young people in urban environments speak,  and very clever expressions and metaphors which I hadn’t heard before. Kingsolver also does a good job of being the voice of a rowdy and randy young man – which surprised me from a middle aged woman.  She certainly got help from young men to create that credible voice.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Elon Musk, by Walter Isaacson

Why this book: I had recently read (listened to) Isaacson’s bio of Steve Jobs and thought he did a great job.  My wife was reading this Musk bio and kept commenting on it. So I uploaded the audible and got started. 

Summary in 3 Sentences Elon Musk grew up in South Africa under an abusive father – and because he was clearly very precocious, and to escape from his father and teh unpleasantness in South Africa, he left to go Canada as a teenager.  Soon after got to the US, made it to Silicon Valley where he began his long journey of turning ground-breaking ideas into reality. This book goes into Musks many near failures that turned into major successes with Pay Pal, Tesla, Space X, Open AI, neuralink and other AI projects, Tesla and self driving cars and more.  It also covers his turbulent personality and private life, with judicious praise and criticism and an impressive effort to be fair and dispassionate. 

My Impressions:  Definitive biography of Musk’s life to this point. I listened to it on audio, so was unable to take notes and highlight sections as I listened to it, which is too bad – there were so many highlight-worthy quotes and insights in the book.   A good list of quotes from this book are available on Goodreads here.

This book provides the backstory on so much that  is happening in the news today – cutting edge breakthroughs in technology that are taking us into the future:  SpaceX, AI, electric vehicles, robotics, neuralink, social media and more… and Musk himself is such a remarkable, yet bizarre character.   A world leader w Asperger syndrome.  Driven, somewhat narcissistic, an idealistic visionary and of course, his personal life is unique and not one most of us would aspire to.  He was emotionally abused as a child – which continues to affect him and the way he treats some around him.  He is relentlessly driven, demands that of others around him,  and has overcommitted himself to the point of exhaustion,  unable to relax for more than a few hours at a time.  He has 10 kids w three different women, and wants to be buried on Mars! It’s a fascinating book.  And his achievements and contributions to technological progress are legendary.  And he’s not done yet. 

Though the book doesn’t say so, I assume Musk had read Isaacson’s bio of Steve Jobs which  was done with Job’s permission and a promise to be hands off.  It appears Musk gave Isaacson the same permissions to do his biography.  Musk’s conversations with Isaacson about events and people are balanced by the perspectives and comments from others affected by Musks actions and decisions – who include many who are not great fans, people who’ve been abused and fired by him, as well as his family, friends and people in his inner circle.

Musk has a unique relationship to risk which Isaacson continues to come back to. He loves drama and the process of risking it all and getting the big pay off. With his rocket launches he took many risks, which led to some epic failures but were essential to his ultimate success.  His motto is to Fail Fast,  learn and move on. 

Musk therefore had no patience with bureaucrats and processes that are designed to slow down progress and mitigate risk.  With his teams he had an “algorithm” which Musk repeated over and over gain, and which had five commandments.

  1. Question Every Requirement.  And you must know the name of the person who made the requirement.
  2. Delete any part of a process you can . You may have to add them back later. In fact, if you do not end up adding back at least 10% of the, then you didn’t delete enough.
  3. Simplify and Optimize. After step 2.  A common mistake is to simplify and optimize a process that shouldn’t exist. 
  4. Accelerate the cycle time – after following the first 3 steps.
  5. Automate. This is the final step – and shouldn’t be done until all reqiremetns had been questions and parts and processes deleted. 

Corollaries

  1. All technical managers should have hands-on experience. There is often too much of a gap between decision makers and those who carry out those decisions. Which leads to bad decisions.
  2. Camaraderie is dangerous.  Hard for good buddies to challenge each other’s work or to fire those who aren’t cutting it. 
  3. It’s OK to be wrong.  Just don’t be confident and wrong.
  4. Never ask your people to do something you’re not willing to do
  5. Whenever there are problems to solve, don’t just meet with your managers. Do a skip-level, where you meet the level right below your managers.
  6. When hiring, look for people with the right attitude. Skills can be taught. Attitude changes require a brain transplant.
  7.  A maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle
  8. The only rules are the ones dictated by the laws of physics. Everything else is merely a recommendation. 

This biography is not only a look at an interesting life, it is a look at a man, a team, a philosophy that is changing the world with not only ideas that initially seem outrageous, but a drive and focus that  get them done and prove his detractors wrong.  He breaks a lot of eggs and makes a lot of enemies in the process – enemies of people who are invested in conventional wisdom, and slow, deliberate process. 

He claims to be politically center-right, economically conservative, and socially liberal, and to have a strong libertarian streak. He has taken on the scions of Silicon Valley and gone to war against what he calls the “woke mind virus” that has infected the progressive left.   Musk hates DEI as an enemy to meritocracy and personal accountability – he is clearly not racist, nor homophobic nor any of those other discriminatory labels – he actively seeks the most capable and driven team players who passionately buy into his vision.   Kind of like the SEAL Teams – emphasizing competence and drive, being a good operator and good teammate. That’s part of why the SEAL Team reading group I help lead has selected this book for it’s April 2024 selection.

It is also a book about leadership.  Being innovative, creative, breaking the rules, demanding and getting top notch performance, not being afraid to let people go who aren’t living up to your demands, or the demands of the job.  He insists that it is imperative for the leader to know details – and to insist that all managers and workers know and understand them as well. But we also see the toxic side of being too emotional, blunt and rude when under stress.  He is moody, sometimes unpredictable, and not easy to work for.   But no one can argue that his approach has not gotten things done and achieved amazing results – even those who work for him admit that he’s gotten them to accomplish things they didn’t think possible. 

Musk has little tolerance for mistakes or for people who want a balanced life. He routinely and unhesitatingly calls people in from vacation, at all hours of the night, on weekends and expects uncomplaining compliance.  But in this, he leads by example, constantly sacrificing time with his family or other endeavors for his work.  Often, he sleeps on the floor in his office and works 7 days a week and doesn’t know how to relax.  A number of his best employees leave, simply burned out, unable to maintain his pace and to ask the sacrifices he demands from their families.  I might have enjoyed this pace of work when I was in my 20s or 30s, but for long, and not after I had a family 

Bottom line: This is a fascinating book about a fascinating man – a somewhat off-balanced, driven,  genius.  It is extremely well written with insider perspectives from an author who was able to sit in on many of the meetings, and meet with the players.  Isaacson gets Musk’s comments on his critics and mistakes, and offers his own balanced perspectives on what he has seen, heard, observed and learned about his subject.  Can’t recommend this book highly enough.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Desert and the Sea, by Michael Scott Moore

Why this book:  January 2024 selection  by my SEAL book club, in part because one of our members knows the author and was able to get him to join our discussion.

Summary in 3 Sentences:  Michael Scott Moore was kidnapped in 2012 and spent more that 2 1/2 years as hostage of Somali pirates who were demanding an exorbitant ransom payment. Not only do we learn of the boredom, frustration, discomfort,  uncertainty and fear associated with being a terrorist hostage,  but Moore also gives us background into the role of piracy in history, the history and culture of Somalia and what his experiences did to his personal values, and sense of himself and his place in the world. It is rich not only with details of his experience but also with his insights, and personal and spiritual growth that came from it. 

My Impressions:  Fascinating read about one man’s experience as a captive in a part of the world about which we read a lot, but know little.  He writes with a journalist’s flair for putting the reader in his shoes, and making his situation real and immediate.  

I have read a number of books by POWs and prisoners – among them and most notably, Stockdale’s In Love and War,  Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning, and this one shares some qualities with those books – all of which include spiritual insights and reflections, suffering, fear and uncertainty, and an adversarial relationship with the captors.  But this one adds something different to that genre – Moore is a journalist with a flair for keeping his audience engaged, and also his captivity was part of a commercial venture – to make money for the captors.  He had a different relationship to his captors, and he had a different hope and expectation for release in the midst of suffering and uncertainty. 

In The Desert and the Sea, we experience with Moore, the months and years of uncertainty, changing news and prospects for recovery, frustration and anger with the lies, deception and even stupidity of his captors, as well as his fear and anxiety of what would come next, and whether he would survive. He also describes Somali culture and history, his relationship with his captors and his fellow captives, and there were many fellow captives  All were being held for ransom – this is a business in Somalia, as it has been in Mexico and other parts of the developing world – capturing citizens of first world nations and holding them for ransom. 

His description of his life before the capture, his childhood and his work as a journalist are all relevant to his experiences and reflections during his captivity.  While in captivity, several times he was beat up, physically abused,  his wrist was broken, he got malaria and only received the medical care that the captors believed would keep him alive long enough to get the ransom they were demanding.  They hoped and expected to get $20m for him in ransom, because in their minds, the US is a rich country and could afford it. They didn’t believe him when he told them that governments don’t as a matter of policy pay ransom.  His captors in general had very little understanding of the world outside their own domain. 

Through Moore, the pirates were able to get in touch with his mother, who was coached by the FBI about how to respond to their demands and phone calls.  His mother’s experiences during this period make up an important part of this book.  The pirates hired negotiators to help them get the money they were demanding, but their demands were way beyond what his friends and family could pay – it then  became a negotiation over price.

Moore  was held captive in various run down remote buildings in the Somali countryside, which he described variously as stinking cess-pools or filthy shit holes. He was fed the same basic beans and gruel, occasionally a bit of meat.  For part of his captivity he was kept on the Nahan3 a ship that the Somalis had captured and had anchored off the coast of Somalia, where he was one of many other  hostages, most of whom had been ship’s crew on various vessels that they had taken. His time on the ship was more tolerable, in that they had plenty of food, he made some friends with other hostages, and there were no mosquitos.  

Throughout his captivity the pirates were aware that US surveillance was looking for him.  During his captivity, there had been a successful rescue by Navy SEALs of Jessica Buchanan and Poul Thisted who had been taken hostage and held for ransom after working on a Danish humanitarian project in Somalia. During the rescue, the SEALs killed 9 Somali pirates.  The pirates holding Moore were aware of this and very afraid of a potential rescue attempt, and vowed to kill Moore immediately if one were attempted.  When they were aware of drones or surveillance aircraft, they hid him, while Moore himself did what he could to make himself visible to any such aircraft.

Ultimately a much lower ransom was paid and Moore was released, and he describes that process at the end of the book, as well as how his life changed afterward. He was able to reconnect with a number of the other hostages who had been able to attain their freedom.

A very engaging  and well-written book.  In addition to a fascinating story, it provides insights into Somalia culture, Somali pirate culture, his strong but occasionally flagging will to survive, his personal and spiritual struggle and growth during a period of suffering and uncertainty, and the squalid and anxious life that hostages for ransom face.  

I like and agree with Barnes and Noble’s short review: 
“A sort of Catch-22 meets Black Hawk Down, The Desert and the Sea is written with dark humor, candor, and a journalist’s clinical distance and eye for detail. Moore offers an intimate and otherwise inaccessible view of life as we cannot fathom it, brilliantly weaving his own experience as a hostage with the social, economic, religious, and political factors creating it.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Count of Monte Cristo, by Alexander Dumas

Why this book: Selected by my literature reading group because none of us had read it, though it is included on most lists of the greatest novels ever written.  That said, most in the group were intimidated by its length and didn’t read it. 

Summary in 3 Sentences:  A happy young man is framed by several men who are jealous of his happiness and prospects for success and he is imprisoned with little hope of release on an Island off the coast of France. While in prison, he becomes friends and a protoge of an old Abbe who had also been framed, and who reveals to the young man where a great treasure is hidden. The Abbe dies, and our protagonist is able to escape, recovers the treasure, reinvents himself as the Count of Mone Cristo, and the remainder of the novel is how he exacts his revenge on those who had framed him and had him sent to prison.  

My Impressions: The Count of Monte Cristo lived up to its billing as one of Western Literature’s great novels. That said, one must make allowances for when it was written, for what audience, and how it would be read.  

The Count of Monte Cristo was originally written as a serial in 18 parts and was released in France over nearly a year and a half.  Knowing that, one sees how Dumas built tension into the book, created detours in his story to entertain and edify his readers, and keep them coming back as the plot evolved. 

To take on The Count of Monte Cristo is to begin a great adventure, and to fully appreciate the novel, it is best to see it that way. The story is generally well know, but what enchanted me was the feeling of immersion into the culture of France in the early 1800s.  That includes the political turmoil surrounding Napoleon’s assumption of power, the return of the King and Napoleon’s banishment to Corsica, his return to power and finally his banishment to Elba.  Edmond Dantes (Monte Cristo’s original name) is accused of spying for Napoleon prior to his return to power from Corsica, which lands him in prison, in the Chateau d’If (a real island castle off the coast of Marseille, France)

Because it is very “long form” we get to know the people, their values and prejudices, their joys and sorrows in a way that is not possible in shorter novels.  We get to know life in the middle and upper classes in France during this period and the characters indeed come to life. And of course, we compare  their culture to our own, our values and perspectives – my,  how people have stayed the same, while culture and values have changed.

The book begins with us getting to know Edmond Dantes in his world, as a happy, talented and promising young man, engaged to be married to woman he loved.  He is betrayed by men who were jealous of his happiness and success, and who after he was imprisoned, went on to profit from his absence and misfortune. The people we meet here – the three men who manufactured his “crime” and framed him,  the prosecutor who also wanted Dantes out of the picture, and Dante’s fiance – these are people we will get to know again 20 years later when Dantes reappears in disguise as the Count of Monte Cristo to exact his revenge anonymously – at first. 

The next portion of the book is about Dantes in prison, dealing with his misfortune, not understanding how or why it happened – almost Kafka-esque in the absurdity of it all. Then he meets the Abbe Faria who teaches and inspires him, until he is able, through cunning and luck, to manufacture an escape.

Dantes is able to recover the Abbe’s treasure to become suddenly extremely wealthy, but he doesn’t reveal himself to the world as Edmund Dantes.  We then lose track of him until he re-emerges as the mysterious Abbe Busoni in one identity, and the Count of Monte Cristo in another  – two identities he uses for the remainder of the book. He doesn’t admit to being Edmond Dantes until the very end.

The remainder of the book is a long story in which we get to know the mysterious Count of Monte Cristo and what has happened to his various antagonists, and how he interacts with them.  There are many side stories which entertain and edify the reader, and paint the picture of France in the early 19th century.

Key themes that I saw:

Edmond Dantes as a young man in love Dumas describes his hero in his early years as a good, eager, moral and ambitious young man, engaged to a beautiful woman and clearly on the path to success. He  someone who is admired by most, but also bitterly envied by those who didn’t have his gifts, talents, or other advantages. One of those who envied him was a competitor for a position on the ship Dantes worked on, and another was in love with the woman Dantes was planning to marry.  These are the ones who plotted to  frame Dantes, and have him arrested, which led to the rest of the story.

Dantes evolution in prison Dantes finds himself in prison on the infamouis Chateau d’If off the coast of Marseille (with many similarities to Alcatraz) with little hope for release, and he doesn’t know why.  He suffers, considers suicide, but survives.  He makes contact with Abbe Faria who also had been framed and was sentenced to life in prison, but who had learned to cope with his fate.  The two became friends, plotted opportunities for escape, and eventually the Abbe revealed to Dantes where he had left a great treasure.  When the Abbe died, Dantes was able to escape, and become “The Count of Monte Cristo.”

The Influence of Abbe Faria  Abbe Faria is undoubtedly the moral hero of the book.  He inspires moral growth in Dantes and though he dies relatively early in the book, his influence is felt in Dantes decisions and actions throughout the book.

His revenge plot – Dantes, now The Count of Monte Cristo, wealthy beyond measure after finding the Abbe’s treasure, is able to find out how and why he was sentenced to life in prison  on the the Chateau d’If, and then to plot his revenge.  It was indeed an ingenious and intricate plot, and adhered to the old adage that revenge is a dish best served cold.  It took years to unfold, and part of his intent was for the co-conspirators lives to be ruined but not to know how, or by whom, as was the case with Dantes.

His final insight – In the end Dantes has succeeded in his goals, even reconnects with his former fiance  with whom he’d remained in love, but too much had happened to each of them in the intervening years since their betrothal to renew their relationship.  Dantes took care of her and her family and then metaphorically “rode off into the sunset,” with an exotic woman whose life he’d saved.  We don’t learn what happened to them.  I did some research and several authors wrote sequels to The Count of Monte Cristo,  and some are considered quite good, but Dumas did not.  

What is missing: There is much in this book which requires the reader to suspend disbelief, but for me the biggest question is what happened to Dantes from the time he found the treasure to when he begins his effort to find and exact revenge for his imprisonment.  Over perhaps a decade, Dantes used his wealth to educate himself, to travel the world, to become multilingual, to become well-versed in the arts – to become a well-travelled man of letters and sophistication.  We are amazed at how he’d reinvented himself as the mysterious Count of Monte Cristo, but we learn little of how he did it.  Money and wealth can only do so much. 

Since I have some experience reading translations of great books, I did some research to determine the best translation, and came up with the Penguin Classics version, translated by Robin Buss and published in 1996.   Many of the other translations were done in the 19th century by Victorian era translators, and the English of that era. Buss’s translation is more accessible to modern, especially American, speakers of English, and corrects what he felt are many errors in the early translations.  The translator’s “notes on the text” at the beginning explain how and why he felt a new translation was important for modern readers.  
Also, I purchased a Cliff Notes to use to follow the book, which I do with most classics.  The Cliff notes version was ok, but used a different translation which had reordered the chapters.  I found that the Wikipedia article on the book was better, and wish I had read that instead as I read the novel. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment